Like obviously not for newer cutting edge games but for newer indie games and older AAA games?

  • who@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    14 hours ago

    On Linux, I find that games run great from a mechanical drive. Loading times are slower, of course, but not enough to bother me.

  • Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I mean it’ll work but you’ll have significantly longer loading times.

  • Jakob Fel@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I’d say it’s only useful for older and less intensive games. Most modern games need an SSD, not just for load times, but for performance as well. I have a 2tb mechanical hard drive for storing my 300gb of music, documents, virtual machine ISOs and pre-2020s games. Everything else goes on SSDs.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Yeah, as long as you’re not too concerned about load time, then an old HDD is still fine.

    I’m an addict. I have a ton of games on my computer. I have 4 NVMe drives and that isn’t enough to hold all my games. So I have smaller indie games and older games like L4D2 on my old school 4TB HDD. No ragrets.

  • Malix@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 day ago

    depends entirely on the game, how it loads stuff and how big the stuff is.

    100 GB openworld game? HDD probably is going to struggle with the asset loading, probably leading to stuttery gameplay or very noticeable pop-in

    <10GB game with closed arenas/levels? Probably loads everything at the start of the level, might take slightly longer on HDD, but probably doesn’t make any difference after that.

    • daggermoon@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I was playing Layers of Fear but noticed very occasional stutters when entering new areas, especially when certain visual effects appear on screen. I’m thinking it’s probably just a bad port. Otherwise, very playable. If you’re not familiar it’s a Unity game from 2016. In general I’ve had good luck running indie games on a HDD.

      • Malix@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’ve heard the game’s name, but otherwise not familiar with it at all. The stutter could be some kind of dynamic shader compilation too, who knows.

  • I have literally only ever seen 2 games that required an SSD in their minimum requirement specs: Starfield and the Oblivion Remaster.

    So you’re probably good if you don’t plan on playing any newer Bethesda games 🤷🏻‍♂️

  • Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    Personally I use my hard drive for storing large games that I’m not actively playing (to be moved back to an SSD when I do), small games (<15GB) where the load times won’t be super long, games with distinct levels with loading screens (hard drives suck for open-world games that stream in assets during play), and games that are just too stupidly large to comfortably fit on my SSD (like freaking ARK, which takes up several hundred gigabytes with the DLC installed).

    One thing I haven’t seen mentioned is that the delta-patching used by Steam’s updater can take ages on a hard drive due to all the random read-writes. Small games (a few gigabytes) can be uninstalled and redownloaded in less time than it’d take to update them. I would avoid putting games that update frequently on your hard drive for this reason.

    • jeff 👨‍💻@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      I used to do that. But then I realized it was faster to redownload than copy over from my HDD. I have gigabit fiber internet though.

      Edit: I had a really crappy HDD though

      • Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        Much faster, yes. Unfortunately a lot of people have monthly bandwidth caps and a single game could take up a huge chunk of that, so better safe than sorry!

        I have a 1TB/month download cap, after which speed is throttled to nearly nothing until the next billing cycle. With several people using the same connection it’s hard to know how much we have left, and redownloading a 250GB game could easily push us over.

  • Sidyctism II.@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    I play pretty much all my games from a HDD. I once moved Control (2019) and DMC5 (2018) to my SSD, barely any difference. though i suspect it would probably have a bigger impact with recent games.

    • daggermoon@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Have you tested Control with the most recent update? I think minimum system requirements went up.

  • CanadianCorhen@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I still run a lot of my games off of spinning rust. Boot times are a little bit longer, but at least i can store a ton of games.

  • tehWrapper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    You can move things to and from different drives in the steam settings pretty easily, so in the past I used to archive larger games I was not playing to a large HDD on my system to avoid having to download it all again.

    When I wanted to play again I moved it back to my SSD.

  • Agent Karyo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Some indie games and AAA games from 10 years ago should be fine.

    That being said, SSD costs are low enough these days that you should be able to play off an SSD.

    • daggermoon@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah I know, thing is I have a lonely, sad 1TB HDD from 2008 that somehow still works and I thought it would be a shame to not game with it. I want it to spend its final years gaming with me. I know, I’m weird. Once it dies, I’l probably get a SATA SSD. I have an M.2 SSD but it’s almost full.

        • daggermoon@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          I don’t want to store things I care about on a drive that old in case it dies. Steam games are a different story. I can just redownload them. I have plenty of storage dedicated to media as it is anyway.

        • reversedposterior@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Agree with this. SSDs are cheap enough these days that there’s no point living with the disadvantages of a hard disk any more apart from in cases where you won’t notice the difference at all (i.e long term storage with not many reads and writes)

  • Sonalder@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    I would at least take SATA SSD nowadays as it’s pretty cheap but honestly I can’t see myself go back to SATA after having enjoyed M.2 SSDs for years now.

    If you want 8TB of storage I can see why HDD would be great but for 2TB or less SSD are accessible if not cheap.

  • TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    SSD is crazy cheap these days. I will never go back. 5 second loading times plus all the other tasks are easily 10x faster.