cqst [she/her]@lemmy.blahaj.zone to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agothe perfect browserlemmy.blahaj.zoneexternal-linkmessage-square197fedilinkarrow-up1682arrow-down132
arrow-up1650arrow-down1external-linkthe perfect browserlemmy.blahaj.zonecqst [she/her]@lemmy.blahaj.zone to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square197fedilink
minus-squareonlinepersona@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20arrow-down3·1 month ago C++ might not be as memory-safe as Rust, but let’s not pretend a Rust code base wouldn’t be riddled with raw pointers. I’m curious. Why do you believe the last statement to be true? Anti Commercial-AI license
minus-squareayyy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·1 month agoDid you paste the wrong link?
minus-squarePoplar?@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·1 month agoThey have that under all their comments.
minus-squareWhyJiffie@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoI don’t know if it’s riddled with it or not, but what I (think to) know is that one of Rust’s goal is to minimize them. No need for raw pointers when handling lists and buffers most of the time.
I’m curious. Why do you believe the last statement to be true?
Anti Commercial-AI license
Did you paste the wrong link?
They have that under all their comments.
I don’t know if it’s riddled with it or not, but what I (think to) know is that one of Rust’s goal is to minimize them. No need for raw pointers when handling lists and buffers most of the time.