I thought In Time had a really cool premise and could have been a great commentary on wealth disparity, but it didn’t do much with it.

Check out Nebula. Lots of YouTubers host there. Subscriptions go straight to the creators, and they cut the sponsor blocks out of the versions they post there.

for free, essentially!

Say that to the Facebook Portal: a fantastic product five years ago that is now having its features gutted because Meta couldn’t figure out how to make money off of it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QEJpZjg8GuA

HBO has it.

I’ve been running plex for a few years no. No real issues to complain of.

Until today. I just upgraded my server with an Intel ARC. Was looking forward to enabling qsv for streaming. Turns out you need plex pass to do that.

Can jellyfin do it?

A little shocked the Rabbit R1 outlived them. Mine is still chugging, though a lot of the features (like MidJourney integration) have been halted.

Gonna be a fun little Android media player in a few months I suppose.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ntPxdWAWq8

My point is what’s the point of downloading kindle ebooks if they can only be read after connecting to the cloud or whatever anyway?

Read the second part of your comment lol.

What other software?

If you download your books, how do you read them in other hardware? Aren’t they all drm locked?

I agree with all of this. My comment is meant to refute the implication that not needing to memorize phone numbers is somehow analogous to critical thinking. And yes, internalized axioms are necessary, but largely the core element is memorizing how these axioms are used, not necessarily their rote text.

Calculators also don’t think critically.

Memorization is not the same thing as critical thinking.

A well designed test will freely give you an equation sheet or even allow a cheat sheet.

Did iOS integration ever get better? I remember a lot of apps constantly needing to get restarted to reconnect to the watch.

I hope the fans sue for royalties.

“We are what we pretend to be, so we must be careful about what we pretend to be.”

-Kurt Vonnegut

The upper-most finger on the hand isn’t an index finger. See where it lands on the palm? The original hand was pointing and they poorly shopped it to make it look like it was holding something cutting off the index finger.

It’s also possible that “We 4 You!” is the intended message. Like if it’s that obvious, do you think the guy who had to add “prepare 4 launch” wouldn’t have noticed it and fixed it? Clearly some post-processing happened here.

The fact that its even debatable if this is AI or not is concerning.

I find this argument a little disingenuous. Debatable is subjective. Someone might just have a really, really poor argument. Not much of a debate. Like depending on who you ask, the authenticity of the Moon landing is debatable.

Most of these “issues” are terrible arguments:

2. AI doesn’t duplicate heads. That’s kind of the whole point of AI. You know what does duplicate features? Lazy compositing.

3. It’s a retro-future movie. That’s a retro-future outfit.

4. and 9) Extras don’t know how to use 70 year old props? This is surprising?

5. We’re going to call out grammar errors, but ignore the flawless pencil drawing of the logo on the other poster?