hydroptic@sopuli.xyz to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 10 months agoPolly wants a deliverablesopuli.xyzimagemessage-square30fedilinkarrow-up1100arrow-down11
arrow-up199arrow-down1imagePolly wants a deliverablesopuli.xyzhydroptic@sopuli.xyz to Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml · 10 months agomessage-square30fedilink
minus-squareconditional_soup@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up8·10 months agoI’ve met this bird. It only prioritizes issues as urgent; when interacted with, it’ll say “yes, this is part of MVP”
minus-squareSkullgrid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·edit-210 months agoI’ll kill you , you stupid bird! If everything is high priority, nothing is high priority!
minus-squarejballs@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-210 months agoI had a list of 30 items I had to prioritize with clients the other day. We ended up with about two dozen Priority 1s and the rest were 2s. So I had to go back and say, “let’s prioritize the 1s” and at least got them to agree to 1.A, 1.B, and 1.C.
minus-squareEphera@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 months agoThis is why I really don’t think absolute priority values work. I much prefer relative priority, i.e. dragging cards into an order. Of course, the challenge with that is in clarifying that it’s not a strict order in which tasks will be tackled.
minus-squareironhydroxide@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 months agoI have had multiple managers who are incapable of understanding this.
minus-squareVent@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 months agoCould be worse, mine have started saying “the MVP must be feature complete and 100% bug free” but there’s a 0% chance there’s enough budget for that.
minus-squarehydroptic@sopuli.xyzOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·10 months agoAnd what sort of an MVP is feature-complete and completely bugless?
minus-squarehydroptic@sopuli.xyzOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·10 months agoMinimum Viable Player
I’ve met this bird. It only prioritizes issues as urgent; when interacted with, it’ll say “yes, this is part of MVP”
I’ll kill you , you stupid bird!
If everything is high priority, nothing is high priority!
I had a list of 30 items I had to prioritize with clients the other day. We ended up with about two dozen Priority 1s and the rest were 2s.
So I had to go back and say, “let’s prioritize the 1s” and at least got them to agree to 1.A, 1.B, and 1.C.
This is why I really don’t think absolute priority values work. I much prefer relative priority, i.e. dragging cards into an order.
Of course, the challenge with that is in clarifying that it’s not a strict order in which tasks will be tackled.
You are a wizard.
I have had multiple managers who are incapable of understanding this.
Could be worse, mine have started saying “the MVP must be feature complete and 100% bug free” but there’s a 0% chance there’s enough budget for that.
And what sort of an MVP is feature-complete and completely bugless?
Wayne Gretzky? 🤷
Minimum Viable Player