• Log in | Sign up@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Ah, my bad, you’re right, for being consistently correct, I should have done 0.3^10=0.0000059049

          so the chances of it being right ten times in a row are less than one thousandth of a percent.

          No wonder I couldn’t get it to summarise my list of data right and it was always lying by the 7th row.

          • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            That looks better. Even with a fair coin, 10 heads in a row is almost impossible.

            And if you are feeding the output back into a new instance of a model then the quality is highly likely to degrade.

        • jwmgregory@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          don’t you dare understand the explicitly obvious reasons this technology can be useful and the essential differences between P and NP problems. why won’t you be angry >:(