HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · edit-22 months agoWhy make it complicated?lemmy.mlexternal-linkmessage-square123fedilinkarrow-up1370arrow-down138file-textcross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1332arrow-down1external-linkWhy make it complicated?lemmy.mlHiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · edit-22 months agomessage-square123fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
minus-squaremasterspace@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up35arrow-down1·2 months agoYeah, it’s explicitly distinct from const a: String which says it won’t change, and var a: String, which means this is legacy code that needs fixing.
minus-squarePsaldorn@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·2 months agoIf there’s only two options you only need one keyword
minus-squareHotzilla@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·edit-22 months agoTrue, but var and let are not same in js, so there is three. if(true) { var a = "dumdum" } console.log(a) Is valid and functioning javascript. With let it is not.
minus-squareLemminary@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoAh, but this is JS, so there are three options! And they all function entirely differently. And your assumptions don’t apply, either. :D
Yeah, it’s explicitly distinct from
const a: Stringwhich says it won’t change, andvar a: String, which means this is legacy code that needs fixing.If there’s only two options you only need one keyword
True, but var and let are not same in js, so there is three.
if(true) {var a = "dumdum"}console.log(a)Is valid and functioning javascript. With let it is not.
Ah, but this is JS, so there are three options! And they all function entirely differently. And your assumptions don’t apply, either. :D