• vrojak@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    9 days ago

    People just keep buying Nvidia, so no need for them to change. AMD has a pretty small share of the GPU market, and Nvidia makes the majority of their money with gpus for data centers anyways.

    We can only hope there’s a bit more competition in the future

    • Aphelion@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      I just swooped my first AMD card to upgrade my 8 year old Nvidia card. The prices even on 40 series Nvidia cards are complely insane. I’m done with Nvidia.

    • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      Yeah, I’ve got a 1060 and a 1080, 1660 in my laptop. I’ll not be getting another Nvidia card.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      People just keep buying Nvidia, so no need for them to change.

      And why wouldn’t they? (they = average Windows gamer)

      AMD decided that my Vega-based iGPU had enough driver updates. Reminder that Vega was kept in iGPUs for quite some time. Vulkan is completely broken under Windows, so I need to enable my NVidia dGPU for things like Doom I+II and Quake I.

      It’s different under Linux where Radeon drivers are open source and developed by Valve and others.

      • vrojak@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 days ago

        Damn I didn’t know the driver situation is that bad in Windows. I’m using my 7900xtx on Linux with absolutely no issues for over a year now.

        But with Linux being popularized by Valve and the steam deck I can see a shift happen where the average consumer might just get a Linux device, fingers crossed.

        • woelkchen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          Damn I didn’t know the driver situation is that bad in Windows.

          It’s better for RDNA GPUs but it’s not the fault of the customers that AMD was still putting Vega cores in relatively recent notebook APUs. Vega is fine for regular web browsing etc but a Vega GPU should easily be able to handle lower end games such as Quake I but just doesn’t.

          • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 days ago

            Quake 1 was released in 1996. Hardware T&L didn’t even exist, I don’t think that’s the driver’s fault that a 90s game can’t launch. Unless you’re talking about the remaster.

            • woelkchen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              I don’t think that’s the driver’s fault that a 90s game can’t launch. Unless you’re talking about the remaster.

              The remaster replaced the old release and I explicitly said Vulkan, so obviously it’s the remaster. You need to jump through some hoops to get the original DOS release these days.

          • Danitos@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            ROCm support for RDNA cards it’s somewhat bad as well. It works, at least on my 6700XT, but it has no oficial support, which is pretty lame.

      • Aphelion@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        I feel that pain too, I had an Intel Skull Canyon NUC with the VEGA 56, and one day, no more graphics drivers!

        Still mad about it, but not as mad as I am about Nvidia’s prices.