Gollum@feddit.org to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 months agoAnother smart movefeddit.orgexternal-linkmessage-square114fedilinkarrow-up11Karrow-down136
arrow-up1966arrow-down1external-linkAnother smart movefeddit.orgGollum@feddit.org to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 months agomessage-square114fedilink
minus-squareIndustryStandard@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down1·2 months agoIt would screw up existing code but doing [array.length() -1] is pretty stupid.
minus-squarethedeadwalking4242@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·edit-22 months agoFor i = 0; I < array.length; i++
minus-squarexthexder@l.sw0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·2 months agoi < array.length or else you overflow.
minus-squareIndustryStandard@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months agoCasually throws in capitals as well.
minus-squarethedeadwalking4242@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoMy post is a work of fiction
minus-squaredan@upvote.aulinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months agoA lot of languages have a .last() or negative indexer ([-1]) to get the last item though.
It would screw up existing code but doing [array.length() -1] is pretty stupid.
For i = 0; I < array.length; i++
i < array.lengthor else you overflow.Casually throws in capitals as well.
My post is a work of fiction
A lot of languages have a
.last()or negative indexer ([-1]) to get the last item though.