irelephant [he/him]🍭@lemm.ee to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 months agolooks good to melemm.eeimagemessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up1391arrow-down13cross-posted to: programmer_humor@programming.dev
arrow-up1388arrow-down1imagelooks good to melemm.eeirelephant [he/him]🍭@lemm.ee to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square21fedilinkcross-posted to: programmer_humor@programming.dev
minus-squareintensely_human@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down3·2 months agoSo catching errors and doing nothing? That exists in every language except maybe BASIC?
minus-squareℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 months agoCatching individual errors is fine. Having all errors be ignored by default is weird.
minus-squarelocuester@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 months agoVery different. This means default ignore all errors and continue to the next line. You’d have to explicitly catch every line in most(all?) other languages.
minus-squareSkull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-219 days ago[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]
So catching errors and doing nothing? That exists in every language except maybe BASIC?
Catching individual errors is fine. Having all errors be ignored by default is weird.
Very different. This means default ignore all errors and continue to the next line. You’d have to explicitly catch every line in most(all?) other languages.
[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]