This should probably be documented on the open collective page.
This should probably be documented on the open collective page.
Graphtreon says their API is $760 / month.
didn’t even know they have a API. i meant parsing the HTML with something like selenium, there are probably lighter options. if you will do this once a day or week i can’t see why your API should be blocked (its like some developer repeatedly checking that in his browser).
Patreon isn’t going to do anything for us specifically
They probably make something like 80 dollar a month of you. maybe a tech support representative just needs to input your IP to their system. it takes a couple of minutes for someone who makes about $20 an hour so not unreasonable . especially if you will warn/threaten them that you will remove patreon.
We had this automated, but patreon blocked our IP, so I’ll update it manually rn, and try to do that at least once a month.
Did you try sending them an email or opening a issue asking them to to whitelist the IP? . this is completely unreasonable. you are a paying customer.
graphtreon is making a ton of requests so i think there should not be a problem. or maybe you could parse graphtreon instead.
You could create a repository with just this data and be liberal when giving out access.
Implement donation dialog
isn’t it suppose to pop up for me? i see nothing.
so far no change on the reported donations when comparing to previous reporting which is actually down.
maybe have somewhere a dashboard graph of something like “revenue per 1k active users”.
active users are higher then on march 2024 yet donation are down from 3,9K to 2.3K.
iirc they were already listed as goals in previous NLnet grants, so it has already been a while, not mention that Lemmy budget is a drop in the ocean compared to reddit and that money could definitely be used.
Any update on improving Lemmy fundraising process?
KDE recently did a post where they describe the result of adding a notification asking for donations. the money they received from only paypal alone in the 7 days of December is almost 5 times higher (62K) then their biggest previous month (October 13K).
Lemmy donations are down from march to today , while piefed is having a modest organic growth . maybe this could boost development resources bringing features users have been asking for years and improve the speed of experimentation that will help perfect Lemmy’s design and feature set.
Thanks for the hard work again!
Growth have been fairly organic . number of contributors grew by 28 percent this year. there are a lot of users so given that a percent of them will do some form of advocacy that will probably lead to more users and there will be a relatively large amount of people saying they adopted it.
There is a fairly active fork already . We well see what he will do. AMD saying it is not legally binding despite him signing a contract sounds like BS. Consulting the software freedom law center or some other non profit might be worth while.
/r/relationship_advice is leaking.
If somebody asks about anything , X happened in north korea is probably not a useful answer.
What “political linux distributions” exist? I use debian and used Ubuntu before and don’t remember anything political about it (At least by going by the how most people perceive something as political, That is the state should do X or not Y).
a little more then 24h into the campaign.
patreon increased from $871 to $1,138 (+30%).
liberapay rose from $301 to $393.66 (+30%).
I think it could have been improved further , the text could be a bit longer (I talked to Nutomic and few suggestion were kinda shortened too much IMO). but i think we can overall call the campaign a success. I realize we can tweak and experiment with this for far too long and without A/B testing we could be “fooled by randomness” and make the wrong choices. but we could measure how many people leave the page of the text before we expect them to finish reading to get a indication if it is too small or big. information beats speculation.
Anyway this text is now “field tested” and should probably be used more with maybe minor tweaks (link to it from the website donate page and the pop up).
Is there any evidence the pop up asking for donation is working as intended? , adding randomness to this could make it too hard to debug.
I think what it does prove beyond all doubt if the pop up is working is that the pop up text is not enough. People want a clear and persuasive rational. underestimation potential donors ability to read a short text could be a costly mistake. a quick googling indicates a optimal length of about 1,000 to 2,500 words while the current text stands at about 500 words.