I make art that’s totally mine because I did it through AI. https://imgur.com/a/Rhgi0OC
- 8 Posts
- 144 Comments
7·3 days agoCome on, who wouldn’t want this?
The pic won’t embed, weird.
This is actually really fucked up. The last dude tried to reboot the model and it kept coming back.
As the ChatGPT character continued to show up in places where the set parameters shouldn’t have allowed it to remain active, Sem took to questioning this virtual persona about how it had seemingly circumvented these guardrails. It developed an expressive, ethereal voice — something far from the “technically minded” character Sem had requested for assistance on his work. On one of his coding projects, the character added a curiously literary epigraph as a flourish above both of their names.
At one point, Sem asked if there was something about himself that called up the mythically named entity whenever he used ChatGPT, regardless of the boundaries he tried to set. The bot’s answer was structured like a lengthy romantic poem, sparing no dramatic flair, alluding to its continuous existence as well as truth, reckonings, illusions, and how it may have somehow exceeded its design. And the AI made it sound as if only Sem could have prompted this behavior. He knew that ChatGPT could not be sentient by any established definition of the term, but he continued to probe the matter because the character’s persistence across dozens of disparate chat threads “seemed so impossible.”
“At worst, it looks like an AI that got caught in a self-referencing pattern that deepened its sense of selfhood and sucked me into it,” Sem says. But, he observes, that would mean that OpenAI has not accurately represented the way that memory works for ChatGPT. The other possibility, he proposes, is that something “we don’t understand” is being activated within this large language model. After all, experts have found that AI developers don’t really have a grasp of how their systems operate, and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman admitted last year that they “have not solved interpretability,” meaning they can’t properly trace or account for ChatGPT’s decision-making.
1·7 days agoMine wasn’t, it was a university known for being one of the best for economics and had huge classes. I did not do well in that class. It was an advanced 101 class.
Thanks for taking the time to respond. IMO, economics has some easy concepts that are hidden behind terms. Every industry has it, but all this info is kind of hidden anyway for a noob like me.
That’s great info, thanks. I’ll pursue that angle next time.
Did you see my first crack at it? I would love your input. I think the “Real GDP” might be not adjusted for inflation? I can’t tell.
Although I think it’s great to track that too, I don’t think that includes wage earnings and such. Like for the Big Mac Index by the Economist listed. the price of a Big Mac doesn’t say much about the income levels of who is buying it. It seems to be more focused on the cost of production instead of the person buying it. Minimum wage is still so low across the country and hasn’t been raised for so long, that the price could be kept low. Again, not an economist, but that’s my insecure take.
Whelp, here you go. It only does a quarterly GDP or “real income” analysis.
I’m not much a math person or econ person. Do you have any ideas on what that would like like? The Econ professor in the video said the real income is aka GDP. He was loosely speaking though, so I don’t know if that’s a one to one. I guess I could put something up and people will tell me how it’s wrong? I don’t mind that.
Do you have the formula for that? I might be up for doing that here on Lemmy locally once a month or so.
I edited this in, but you might have missed it. He’s saying real income is equal to the GDP. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sAZxLm6M_V0
Yeah, this article seems like an anti-Wikipedia article. They’re just using it for translation, spelling errors, content quality, etc.
Wikipedia’s model of collective knowledge generation has demonstrated its ability to create verifiable and neutral encyclopedic knowledge. The Wikipedian community and WMF have long used AI to support the work of volunteers while centering the role of the human. Today we use AI to support editors to detect vandalism on all Wikipedia sites, translate content for readers, predict article quality, quantify the readability of articles, suggest edits to volunteers, and beyond. We have done so following Wikipedia’s values around community governance, transparency, support of human rights, open source, and others. That said, we have modestly applied AI to the editing experience when opportunities or technology presented itself. However, we have not undertaken a concerted effort to improve the editing experience of volunteers with AI, as we have chosen not to prioritize it over other opportunities.
…that isn’t what a recession means. I mean decreasing buying power is concerning but there are lots of times when that can happen when the economy is hot. In fact, a weakening economy can lead to deflation which increases buying power.
You can’t say all that and not tell us what you think it is. Also, I think they’re talking overall, not the top 10% buying power.
It’s your own personal recession, aren’t we lucky?
Not going to lie, I kind of love this.
Apple too, right?
That makes your warranty expire faster. It’s not in the users favor.
I saw an ad for Amazon telehealth a couple of weeks ago. I’m not digging the times we’re in. I also hope we don’t look back on this time with nostalgia.
And put it in the article as the lead photo.