yeah, but it can do really cool things like “suggest a name for my project that does X”.
surely that game’s worth the candle, yes?
yeah, but it can do really cool things like “suggest a name for my project that does X”.
surely that game’s worth the candle, yes?
while you may be right, one would think that the problem lies in the overestimated peception of the abilities of llms leading to misplaced investor confidence – which in turn leads to a bubble ready to burst.
… bunch of douchebag techbros thinking it’s going to solve all the world’s problems with no side effects…
one doesn’t imagine any of them even remotely thinks a technological panacaea is feasible.
… while they get super rich off it.
because they’re only focusing on this.
big talk from someone with McSwag in their username!
In general, the report found that the AI summaries showed “a limited ability to analyze and summarize complex content requiring a deep understanding of context, subtle nuances, or implicit meaning.” Even worse, the Llama summaries often “generated text that was grammatically correct, but on occasion factually inaccurate,”
how is this being accepted? one would have to go through any output with a fine-toothed comb anyway to weed out ai hallucinations, as well as to preserve nuance and context.
it’s like the ai tells you that mona lisa has three eyes and a nose and her mouth is closed but her denim jacket is open. you’re going to report that in your story without ever looking at the painting?
it’s been 40 years since he’s been back?!
6 million bodies over 1,400 years is on average almost 4,300 bodies each year, or a little less than 12 bodies each day.
maybe that’s just the ai’s internal monologue leaking through?
or, alternatively, their lifetime offer has truly been honoured.
solving global warming is really simple: kill off all human beings.
i wonder how long ai algorithms will take to figure that out.
this article is a load of bollocks;
i really love my smart idiot box!
but wait, this may sound bad,
we interrupt this limerick for an ad –
have you thought of switching to our socks?
one might say that this piece of news is the… canary… in the coal mine?
why would any of google’s customers pay to stuff its ads into such a broken feature?
it’s like embossing your logo within a toilet bowl – sure, a lot of people will get to see it but mostly only when it’s submerged in shit.
youtube bermudas.
why did they stop at “aluminum”? why don’t they have “magnesum”, “barum”, or “radum”?
why don’t nfl games take place in a “stadum”? why is the size between small and large not a “medum”?
either their table salt ahould contain sodum or their treatment of aluminium is so dumb.
or build in a return-to-factory-by-yourself feature into them.
he’s so good at comedic roles that he often has himself in splits in his movies.
how would you feel about an article titled,
“This” word in article titles infuriates internet readers
you do know how to use the oxford comma, i’ll grant you that.