fuck me var is going to suck some worser balls, isn’t it?

california android. was that before or after ice cream sandwich?

i have keepass on only one device. i don’t mind looking up individual passwords and typing them in manually when on other devices.

on the device which hosts keepass, the app is hidden and hoops must be jumped to reach it.

i back up the encrypted password database once a month to a cloud service as insurance against me losing that one device.

it’s not the most convenient setup but i sleep so much easier for it.

maybe that’s why rosebud wasn’t a fucking flower.

like petroleum companies opposing bills that aim to encourage batteries during rides.

whatsapp-free since 2023!

this story reminds me of the mitchell and webb death ray bit.

romcom idea: childless man has crush on childed man. he’s raring to come back to work to hang out with hot dad man, but the latter is forced to work remotely.

the whole plot swivels around how they get around the lack of opportunities to be together.

and the aircraft manufacturer for such runways would be called Boing.

10% 4chan

why didn’t they just say 0.4chan and be done with it?

who the fuck is going to buy anything that’s endorsed by my ugly mug?

“Actually Indians”.

but this article espouses that llms do the opposite of logic, planning, and reasoning?

quoting:

Claude, on occasion, will give a plausible-sounding argument designed to agree with the user rather than to follow logical steps. We show this by asking it for help on a hard math problem while giving it an incorrect hint. We are able to “catch it in the act” as it makes up its fake reasoning,

are there any sources which show that llms use logic, conduct planning, and reason (as was asserted in the 2nd level comment)?

but there’s been significant research and progress in tracing internals of LLMs, that show logic, planning, and reasoning.

would there be a source for such research?

this article is why secondary sources (and beyond) are important.

the op is just an assertion made by cbc with no sources (credible or otherwise) whatsoever.

while i share the sentiment, the ai model here isn’t looking to harvest email ids. their model is to harvest the content of email messages and summarise them into a list of “a citizen’s most pressing concerns”.

aliases will not allay the qualms of such a service.

obligatory steve mould video explaining how it works.

“let’s uproot all these trees and invade this space. and when the roots of the few remaining trees do what they are supposed to do, let’s blame them for ‘ruining’ human infrastructure!”

this is the AI model that truly passes the Turing Test.

they weren’t feeling lucky?