I can paint as many nude images of Rihanna as I want.

OK but this is why people give a shit when a CEO is cagey about how their magic box works

https://archive.is/nrAjc

Yep here you go. It’s currently a very famous lawsuit.

That’s one example, plus I’m talking generally why this is an important question for a CEO to answer and why people think generally LLMs may infringe on copyright, be bad for creative people

The issue is that the LLMs do often just verbatim spit out things they plagiarized form other sources. The deeper issue is that even if/when they stop that from happening, the technology is clearly going to make most people agree our current copyright laws are insufficient for the times.

Just pop a bike rack on your back plates and you are good to go.

That was my interest in the story. Technology is so ingrained in our lives. It’s weird more furniture doesn’t have power chargers and other cords better designed into them. It’s weird our houses and electrical codes haven’t caught up.

But this is just a huge step back. Unless I’m unaware of lots of other new and old buildings with similar issues.

The platform formerly called Prince

This

Making a better chat bot AI girlfriend, informing porn directors, leaking it to the Russians,

I think the idea is that in order for private companies to take the money, some of it has to go to HBCU as research contracts. Biden can’t just decided to tell a school to research some niche chip topic. The researchers leading the project have to hit a wall, and work with universities to research and solve it…

Yeah the article could explain way better. The big money for schools these days, besides grant money, is private partnerships. That’s what I think is going on here.

OK, so what does what happens in one person’s family have to do with all children?

Again you might teach your kids to walk safely on the sidewalk, but if something changes and ten of thousands of kids just start walking off the sidewalk… Wouldn’t that be an issue worth considering?

Scroll up and see what Southern Samurai said

I’m not comparing it to smoking.

If someone’s response to “social media is bad for kids”, then to me “I keep my kids away from it, easy peasy” is not a response that invalidates the original argument. It actually supports the idea: social media is dangerous, therefore I intervene as a parent.

Yes I’m being a little lazy, but I’m not a research scientist. Gooogling some thing like “mental illness social media” is pretty easy. There’s lots of studies finding at least a little corelation.

I’m not shocked your linked study says that there is very little evidence of social media causing mental health issues. I wouldn’t even be shocked if it’s true.

It still doesn’t mean that good parenting and social media access go hand in hand.

Just trying to have a conversation and not get a PhD in the process.

If I post some links you will probably decide that they aren’t satisfactory. You could just look into it yourself, or perhaps provide the reason you don’t like those studies generally.

There is lots of research looking at mental health affects of social media.

OK… Good parenthood doesn’t invalidate the idea that the modern internet is bad for some/many kids.

Smoking is bad for kids, even if you don’t let your kid smoke, smoking hurts the health of kids who do. Right?

I don’t have kids. And I respect the Kids These Days perspective…

But aren’t you concerned about how quickly YouTube and Facebook are known to show new users radical content? Have you read studies about how social media may be related to unprecedented mental illness in kids?

Aren’t algorithms and social media at least a little different than books and television? Aren’t they razor focused on making us sad and addicted?

That’s not the point. If Joe the artist makes $25,000 a year breaking copyright, that doesn’t mean copyright is now meaningless.

It’s called the library