I genuinely think pot of greed wouldn’t even be that great

I mean if people move to steamOS how is that not a win?

Everyone that doesn’t have a switch?

Over time they realised that, while holiday windows or whatever have high sales, if there’s a better or more popular game coming out then, yours will just be forgotten.

That said, most “industry specialists” are just glorified influencers, so take it with a grain of salt

Removing sinophobia =/= censorship.

China does good thing Average lemmitor: this is bad actually

Which is a reddit theory and it was never proven that he cheated, regardless of the method.

The only people saying this were Ultima players from 2005 before they tried and WoW and switched.

So, is it the world first or not? They were technically the first…

Damn, lemmy is so good that it has a time machine to read comments from 2005!

With the amount of 9s and 10s coming out, why would you waste time with a 7? The polarisation is just an effect of the language of clickbait spreading in society, but doesn’t change the fact that average games are probably not worth your time.

There was a window where the AMD 6000 series were cheap and readily available, which was probably your best bet. Now we have to wait the AI bubble to burst. Hopefully.

ARC unfortunately still has a few driver problems. While it’s infinitely better than when it launched, if you went with it most of the time you’d have to wait a few weeks before new games are playable.

Every game that didn’t get made is the greatest game of all time in someone’s head.

Why do we like to pretend waterfall is this great old way to do stuff that had no problems at all?

I hope this is still early in development. You can’t have a game set exclusively in a city where buildings look like that.

Yes, it squashes the steam deck, that’s what I said.

I can’t be the only one who has wasted half an hour wondering why something wasn’t working before realising the response was cached.

I believe the biggest issue is more to do with matchmaking trying to provide engagement rather than good assessment of players’ skills. This is obvious when you see systems where winning gives you a good amount of points/tank regardless of the opponents skill level, which just foments even more the want for easy stomps rather than good games.

Is this complaining about skill-based matchmaking?