You’re arguing with an AI. It’s a computer. It doesn’t have an opinion. It gives perspective on both sides and you determine an answer. Just because you have more conviction it doesn’t make the AI formulate an opinion.

Well, that’s the intent at least. Not to form an opinion.

Bye Tankie.

You just named Western FOSS companies and completely ignored the “psyops” part. This is a Chinese psyops tool disguised as a FOSS.

99.9999999999999999999% can’t afford or have the ability to download and mod their own 67B model. The vast majority of the people who will use it will be using Deepseek vanilla servers. They can collect a mass amount of data and also control the narrative on what is truth or not. Think TikTok but on a work computer.

Not everyone can afford hardware that can support a 67B LLM. You’re talking top tier hardware.

When there is free software, the user is the product. It’s just a psyops tool disguised as a FOSS.

You’re expecting an opinion. It’s an AI chatbot. Not a moral compass. It lays out facts and you make the determination.

If you verbose, you can see all the reasoning behind the answers. With Taiwan, it’s hard coded in without /thinking

Yes and no. Not many people can afford the hardware required to run the biggest LLMs. So the majority of people will just use the psyops vanilla version that China wants you to use. All while collecting more data and influencing the public like what TikTok is doing.

Also another thing with Open source. It’s just as easy to be closed as it is open with zero warnings. They own the license. They control the narrative.

Except they control not only the narrative on politics but all aspects of life. Those inconvenient “hallucinations” will turn into “convenient” psyops for anyone using it.

I did. The answer it gave is clear and concise with no judgement. Instead it talks about the argument on both sides. Not the “magical Hasbara dance” you promised me.

Try asking Deepseek about Taiwan independence and watch how it completely ignores all (/think) and gives a false answer.

The question of whether Israel is currently committing genocide is a subject of intense debate among international organizations, scholars, and political entities.

Accusations of Genocide:

Amnesty International’s Report: On December 5, 2024, Amnesty International released a report concluding that Israel is committing genocide against Palestinians in the Gaza Strip. The report cites actions such as killings, causing serious bodily or mental harm, and deliberately inflicting conditions calculated to bring about the physical destruction of Palestinians in Gaza.

UN Special Committee Findings: In November 2024, a UN Special Committee found that Israel’s methods of warfare in Gaza are consistent with characteristics of genocide, noting mass civilian casualties and widespread destruction.

Scholarly Perspectives: Israeli historian Amos Goldberg has stated that the situation in Gaza constitutes a genocide, pointing to the extensive destruction and high civilian death toll as indicative of genocidal intent.

Counterarguments:

Israeli Government’s Position: The Israeli government asserts that its military actions in Gaza are aimed at dismantling Hamas, a group designated as a terrorist organization by multiple countries, and emphasizes efforts to minimize civilian casualties.

Criticism of Genocide Accusations: Organizations such as the American Jewish Committee (AJC) reject the genocide label, arguing that Israel’s actions are self-defense measures against Hamas and do not meet the legal definition of genocide.

Legal Definition of Genocide:

According to the UN’s 1948 Convention on Genocide, genocide includes acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial, or religious group. These acts encompass killing members of the group, causing serious bodily or mental harm, and deliberately inflicting conditions calculated to bring about the group’s physical destruction.

Conclusion:

The determination of whether Israel’s actions constitute genocide involves complex legal and factual analyses. While some international bodies and scholars argue that the criteria for genocide are met, others contend that Israel’s military operations are legitimate acts of self-defense. This remains a deeply contentious issue within the international community.

Oh shit. I didn’t think of that. That’s probably why.

Stremio + real debrid. My 6 year old can navigate around on his own now.

So the president has the authority to extend it for 90 days. After that it’s done?

Real talk, does Trump have the actual authority to save the app?

Hm… Let me try again maybe with a different email.

How long did you wait? I submitted for an account a few days ago. Not even a confirmation email saying anything.

I signed for loops for awhile. Still no account.

When I find bugs, I use screen capture software to repo it.

Sony gave us that webcam feature for free. Please don’t get any bright ideas, Sony.