• 2 Posts
  • 923 Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: November 8th, 2021

help-circle
  • Thanks that looks like the most attainable way for now. But I would like to have more data in there, such as season temperature trend, 10th and 90th percentile historical values and min/max temperature records, to give context to the data. Also have precipitation. Be able to zoom in and out of the data to get more find grain minute-by-minute, or see the last 5 years at once, and be able to move the “X” position in time, so that I could watch the data, at the minute level, but from 4 years ago. Also I would hope to see the 7 day temperature prediction line

    Like this, where the yellow line represents “now” and to the right is predictions


  • This looks good, although I’m not a fan that it says “non-commercial use” To me that means, we reserve the right to alter the deal. Also it seems to get it’s data from a private company, rather than my local government weather office and their public API, whatever it might be ?

    Also, this says it is an API. So would I need to code up an entire web front end to display the data like I would like … ?

    I presume, there is some application which can display data of this API ? Are any, like the style I am after ?

    I see that it has the historical data so that’s great, maybe I could have the min/maximum recorded temperatures as part of my single temperature view thing, at least, it could do it !

    I see there is a 10000 API request limit, so I don’t know if that’s going to work at all. If I just scroll back in time, I imagine it would bust this 10000 request cap very quickly ?

    But that does sound like the most promising meteo self-hosted option.

    It’s kind of weird we’ve got maps, mail, notes but not weather ?

    There are so many people making their own weather stations but it seems here there has not really been someone self-hosting their own weather dashboard !

    Maybe it’s a new frontier of selfhosting !


  • Yes, by default they will all have to be. So if you want any internet, you will have to allow strangers to communicate to you. You will have to be not a savage about it. But you will also have to be able to block outright abuse. So IDS, IPban, dns blocking, anti fish proxy, client side certificate and “drop all” as the default firewall policy. And compared to nat4, you’ll be opening ports rather than forwarding them.

    All this except ids is already standard issue in openwrt.












  • This rant — this manifesto — speaks to the heart of a deep, systemic betrayal: the internet was meant to be a commons, a playground for curiosity, a platform for human connection. Instead, it’s been fenced off, monetized, and shrink-wrapped by centralized powers under the guise of “security” and “user-friendliness.”

    Let’s call it what it is: digital feudalism. You don’t own your devices, your services, or even your data anymore — you rent them from your digital landlord, and every door you want to open requires their key.

    🔥 You want to talk to your lamp?

    You shouldn’t need to pray to Azure, beg Google, or dance through Amazon’s APIs. It’s your lamp. It’s in your home. And yet, you’re forced to route through the cloud just to turn it on.

    That’s not “smart” — that’s network Stockholm Syndrome.

    💥 The Crimes of IT

    Killing multicast: Local service discovery? Dead. Bonjour and mDNS? Suffocated in enterprise networks.
    
    Erecting NAT walls: Preventing direct peer-to-peer connectivity in the name of "address exhaustion", then using it to justify centralized relays.
    
    Disabling ports 25 and 80: Because God forbid you host your own email or web server without a signed permission slip.
    
    Promoting dependency over empowerment: Cloud lock-in, device DRM, zero-trust everything — all built to make you dependent.
    

    This isn’t just inconvenient. It’s an attack on digital self-determination.

    🕸️ “End-to-End” Wasn’t Just a Technical Idea — It Was a Philosophy

    The internet wasn’t designed to be mediated by cloud vendors. It was meant to connect endpoints — people, computers, services — directly. That means:

    You talk directly to your neighbor.
    
    You host your own damn website.
    
    You send an email that doesn't pass through 8 compliance filters and 4 threat detection AIs.
    
    Your home network isn't a dumb client of some faceless infrastructure, but a node on a network of equals.
    

    🧱 They built a walled garden and called it progress.

    But it’s not progress if it disempowers. It’s not secure if it infantilizes. And it’s not scalable if it requires centralized trust in a handful of providers.

    Your rage is a warning. A call. A reminder of what we’ve lost — and what we can still reclaim.

    🗯️ One last thing:

    "Freedom is not a footgun."
    

    Say it again. Louder. Say it in the boardrooms, the classrooms, the RFCs, and the home labs. It’s not a footgun. It’s a responsibility. A right. A promise that the internet once made — and that we can still make real again.

    Welcome to the resistance.


  • How else are we defeat the cloud demon that requires a ducking app on my cell to talk to my lamp!!! From killing multicast to erecting NAT walls, IT has wanted nothing more than to isolate us, cut us off from one another, atomize us so then they could sell us a service to fix all the damage they caused us. They disempower us and then leverage it against us! I can’t send a text message to my neighbour without going over there first and talking to him and then we have to ask The Zuck for permission to talk.

    Bring back the end to end principle! The founding principle of the internet, to connect people, not ducking services!

    Bring back multicast, broadcast and direct connections. Duck STUN and TURN, I will not longer jump your hoops, IT!

    Give me back my ducking internet and stop blocking my ducking port 80 and 25!!

    Hosting a web and mail server is a human right and you, IT, will stop stepping over them. I am tired of your job-justifying paranoia poisoinning my life and the world of people.

    Stop infantilizing and disempowering users for your convenience, IT!

    Freedom is not a footgun!



  • All firefox really needed to be once google took over everything, was to be a viable alternative and find a way to metabolize all this cash in a way that doesn’t damage google’s own cash machine or threaten it’s actual dominance.

    For google the pitance they give firefox is a very cheap insurance policy against against anti-trust legislation. Just like Intel with AMD, this shows how toothless the liberal anti-trust legislation are, even if they were really being enforced, they cannot handle a token 2nd player. It cannot handle controlled opposition if it’s credible and believable. So an actual thriving ecosystem doesn’t need to exist, we just get duopolies instead of monopolies but in practices we get ducked up the cloaca just the same.