No no even with aerospace, you’re good now. We’re deregulating everything. It’ll be fine. Definitely won’t be catastrophic. Don’t worry about it. 🫠

lol maybe because they’re really overtly censoring stuff and it’s getting so obvious even investors realize that it’s killing itself?

lol ok, but HP is still a bag of dicks

I tend to just whip up a script of some sort that employs widely used libraries for the conversion. I know that’s more technical than most people would have the tolerance or aptitude for, but for me, it’s the least ambiguous and most secure way to do stuff like that. And then I can squirrel it away in a utility scripts directory and use it later if I need it again.

Doing illegal things is the new black, haven’t you heard?

Also, how exactly would they catch anyone doing this?

quickly vendors installed packages

I’m not importing anything. What are you talking about?

Filthy casuals using ChatGPT as a crutch to feel lonely. Just get some clinical grade depression like a real man.

I just wanna build cool shit and solve puzzles using the smallest amount of code possible that still makes sense to read. That’s fun to me. I’ve honestly gotten incredibly sick of renting by brain out to people for the majority of my waking hours mostly just to put a roof over my head.

Notice me, sudoers 🥺👉👈

“Must”

hello, police? I need to report a misuse of RFC 2119

Because the CEO “sent his heart out to the world”. Ain’t no coming back from that public perception, tbh.

I just turn of my camera and turn on Forza Motorsport or something like that

What

This is just so, so dumb.

People like to hate EA because it gives them a sense of pride and accomplishment

Broadly speaking, I’d classify “being dumb” as being incurious, uncritical, and unskeptical as a general rule. Put another way: intellectual laziness - more specifically, insisting on intellectual laziness, and particularly, being proud of it.

A person with a lower than normal IQ can be curious, and a person with a higher than normal IQ can be incurious. It’s not so much about raw intelligence as it is about the mindset one holds around knowledge itself, and the eagerness (or lack thereof) with which a person seeks to find the fundamental truth on topics that they’re presented with.

And you know what? The people who believe that are right.

Note that that’s not a commentary on the capabilities of LLMs.

They’re not going to pay you if they classify it as “not a problem”. And you get what you pay for.

Honestly, I would encourage any researcher who gets a brush-off response like this as a response to a real and meaningful security report to lean even harder into malicious compliance. Simply post it to TikTok or Instagram or whatever - and I am intentionally picking the pervasive platforms that I despise and find problematic, simply because they have the largest user bases. If it’s “not a problem”, they shouldn’t mind if how-to videos explaining how to elicit the “not problematic” behavior start going viral.

everything’s computer