

I know that “Vanity Addresses” are a common thing for onion sites, and there are tools which generate tons of keys looking for prefixes. I haven’t seen such a tool for ssh host keys though.
I know that “Vanity Addresses” are a common thing for onion sites, and there are tools which generate tons of keys looking for prefixes. I haven’t seen such a tool for ssh host keys though.
manually call the others
Yeah, most distros will set up source
chains to make things nicer for users.
Yeah, I’d write this as a single update
script with options to update vimplugins
or update pkg
or update all
.
I see that you want it to be a function so you can get the chdir as a side effect, but mixing that with updating doesn’t make sense to me.
When in doubt, ~/.zshrc
. It’s the right choice 99% of the time. Otherwise, there’s a chance you fuck up scripts you’ve installed which assume no shell options have been changed in non-interactive contexts.
What kind of functions do you write which you share between your scripts? Generally if I’m wanting to reuse a non-trivial function, I extend the functionality of the first script instead.
Select the color which matches the steps before filenames ((non-)login and (non-)interactive), then follow that arrow the rest of the way. There’s more colors in Bash because Bash makes a distinction between remote and local shells.
Another way to look at the same data for Zsh (note: $ZDOTDIR
will be used instead of $HOME
if it’s defined at any step along the way):
File | neither | interactive | login | both |
---|---|---|---|---|
/etc/zshenv |
x | x | x | x |
${ZDOTDIR:-$HOME}/.zshenv |
x | x | x | x |
${ZDOTDIR:-$HOME}/.zprofile |
x | x | ||
${ZDOTDIR:-$HOME}/.zshrc |
x | x | ||
${ZDOTDIR:-$HOME}/.zlogin |
x | x | ||
${ZDOTDIR:-$HOME}/.zlogout |
x | x |
One confusion on the Bash side of the diagram is that you see branching paths into ~/.profile
, ~/.bash_profile
and ~/.bash_login
. Bash will use for ~/.bash_profile
, ~/.bash_login
, and ~/.profile
, in that order, and execute only the first one that exists and is readable.
CSS is turing conplete.
You could still NAT between v6’s though.
That’s a latrine. They’re talking about a fancy light fixture.
Nope. If you open a nonexistent path and you have permissions to write to that directory, then that file is created.
Move the keyboard to the floor
Video files are just a bunch of zip files in a trenchcoat.
Bryan Lunduke on /c/programmerhumor? Not what I expected, but okay.
I think each of 3.8 through 3.11 were substantial, just in different ways.