• 0 Posts
  • 93 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: August 15th, 2023

help-circle
  • Nobody is asking ‘software’ companies to support software they didn’t write.

    We are asking hardware companies to support their hardware and not use different software as an excuse not to replace faulty hardware.

    They can reflash their own software to test if needed.

    Of course hardware vendors could be legally mandated to adhere to standards to make things easier.



  • I doubt even Apple is stupid enough to end up with a significant quantity of un-sellable stock just to ‘make a point’. Or that major vendors wound not have an agreement to rtv merchandise they can’t sell after a certain date. Apple will either use them for parts or reflash them if possible to meet different jurisdictions’ regulations and sell them there.

    In regards to existing devices continuing to be used being better for the environment, the law allows that (which), it allows lighting cables (or micro-usb) to be continue to be sold so you can keep charging your working device. You won’t however have to buy new cables and chargers for a new device if you already have a usb-c cable (and compatible charger), nor will it have to be bundled with every new device.

    The software code issue is out of scope of this law. There are initiatives that do somewhat help with planned obsolescence such as requiring manufacturers to allow app installation from alternative sources. Of course they could go further, such as allowing to boot an alternative OS, or preventing malicious compliance better. But that cannot be criticism of this directive.







  • At the moment the party with the most blame is the one getting away scot-free, the parents (esp. stepfather) and they are suing somebody else for money and perhaps also to shape the narrative.

    It’s probably smart, most people are probably not contemplating whether the parents were at any fault for the suicidal tendencies of the child. It’s all conveniently blamed on a the moral panic de jour.

    Limits on AI should be set by laws and regulations not judicial decisions or even worse a possible settlement.