Make the phone half as thick, then double the battery and fill the rest with thermals.
Apple: Yes, yes, this innovation constitutes a $600 price increase.
Make the phone half as thick, then double the battery and fill the rest with thermals.
Apple: Yes, yes, this innovation constitutes a $600 price increase.
SpaceOS is built for the modern Web, so anything you do on the Web, you can now do - in space.
AKA it’s a glorified Chromebook in terms of functionality. Not there yet…
Don’t see it. Could somebody give me a pointer?
I mean, I don’t think that’s the way to go about it. Trains don’t take me to my family across the planet in 11 hours. I’d prefer to feel secure when flying there.
Also, researchers asking ChatGPT for long lists of random numbers were able to extract its training data from the output (which OpenAI promptly blocked).
Or maybe that’s what you meant?
I’m both, I say fuck all the time. I fuck on and off the clock.
My first thought exactly :P
On the other hand, TAI does not take into account the variations in Earth’s rotation speed, which determines the true length of a day. For this reason, UTC is constantly compared to UT1. Before the difference between the two scales reaches 0.9 seconds, a leap second is added to UTC.
On average, Earth has been slowing down a bit over the past decades, so UTC is currently running 37 seconds behind TAI.
It’s still very impressive. The EEG she uses only reads general thoughts: e.g. thinking about pushing a boulder. She can only really do specific actions with that: there’s no level of analog control (how much should this move), it’s just a single action (fire a fireball). The brain chip is likely much higher fidelity and therefore can read much finer signals. All the credit goes to the researchers, of course, who’ve spent the last decade researching and fine tuning this technology.
IIRC they’re paralyzed from the shoulders down, so probably not.
Does it do it well, though?
damn bleeding edge males
First guy looks really happy he forgot the BBQ tools.
I mean, it will be. The AI friend is always available, always knows what to say, never fights with you, and never messes up (ideally).
However, all those things are part of the human element: and at the end, you’re still talking to a computer. The AIs are just trying to please you. A person can actually love you, and that’s something else. And I’d take that over the perfect chatbot any day.
AI’s not bad, it just doesn’t save me time. For quick, simple things, I can do it myself faster than the AI. For more big, complex tasks, I find myself rigorously checking the AI’s code to make sure no new bugs or vulnerabilities are introduced. Instead of reviewing that code, I’d rather just write it myself and have the confidence that there are no glaring issues. Beyond more intelligent autocomplete, I don’t really have much of a need for AI when I program.
Journalists use AI to write longer articles. People use AI to summarize those articles.
The circle of LLMs.
Trailing slash lets you do this though: