This looks really cool. Anyone know if there is a way to make something like this ingest a gedcom file and put out a visual like this?

Did you have a mistake in your caddyfile? Or, what led to this? I’m using caddy as well and could be good to know, though I don’t recall seeing that warning.

Here. I’m on docker 3.7. I think it’s correct…

services: elinorr: image: registry.gitlab.com/mwirth001/elinorr:latest container_name: elinorr environment: - PUID=1000 - PGID=1000 - TZ=America/Chicago - SHOW_LIST="design-squad" volumes: - '/mnt/user/appdata_docker/elinorr:/elinorr/config' - '/mnt/user/media/zz_downloads/elinorr_downloads:/elinorr/downloads' restart: unless-stopped

deleted by creator

Ty sir 🫡

So I just got back to this today and I still have the same error:

KeyError: 'collections' '2025-04-08 20:31:17,226 - INFO - Entering elinorr function' '2025-04-08 20:31:17,226 - INFO - Successfully set show_list.' '2025-04-08 20:31:17,226 - INFO - Successfully finished pre-flight checks, beginning main loop of Elinorr.' '2025-04-08 20:31:17,228 - INFO - Successfully connected to elinorr.db.' '2025-04-08 20:31:17,229 - INFO - Processing show "design-squad"' Traceback (most recent call last): File "/elinorr/elinorr.py", line 175, in <module> elinorr(SHOW_LIST, WORK_DIR, SCAN_INTERVAL) File "/elinorr/elinorr.py", line 136, in elinorr for episode in content_json['collections']['episodes']['content']: KeyError: 'collections' '2025-04-08 20:31:19,132 - INFO - Entering elinorr function' '2025-04-08 20:31:19,132 - INFO - Successfully set show_list.' '2025-04-08 20:31:19,133 - INFO - Successfully finished pre-flight checks, beginning main loop of Elinorr.' '2025-04-08 20:31:19,135 - INFO - Successfully connected to elinorr.db.' '2025-04-08 20:31:19,137 - INFO - Processing show "design-squad"' Traceback (most recent call last): File "/elinorr/elinorr.py", line 175, in <module> elinorr(SHOW_LIST, WORK_DIR, SCAN_INTERVAL) File "/elinorr/elinorr.py", line 136, in elinorr for episode in content_json['collections']['episodes']['content']: KeyError: 'collections'

Also tried with just "design-squad", and tried with "cyberchase design-squad"

Fyi the pirates version i found was a workgroup release and was missing a lot of visual effects at my first brief skim through it. That’s the only reason we went to the movies to watch it (my kid’s request).

Though, the movie really wasn’t that good (from someone that never got into minecraft). But like, the world of war warcraft movie was a good stand alone movie (from someone that never got into WoW).

Ah cool. Thanks for checking it out.

Ah. I just walked away from my computer for the day. I can check tomorrow.

So i got the container running, logs are showing the same error loop every couple of seconds. I’m wondering if it’s because the video url don’t match what’s in your gitlab readme:

https://pbskids.org/videos/watch/design-squad-full-episodes/1385861/one-giant-leap-part-2-ep-409/35449

https://pbskids.org/videos/watch/cyberchase-full-episodes/1385841/if-you-cant-stand-the-heat/1568637

I’m also interested 🫡

Maybe I’ll have to try again. https://www.reddit.com/r/Lidarr/comments/1bq1zot/comment/m6ecbr2/

This was my experience downloading with deemix and trying to import into lidarr, even with the two programs combined into one.

This looks interesting. Just a few thoughts (sorry if these dont belong in a recruitment post, feel free to ignore):

Radarr and sonarr already have a function to look at ones library and offer recommendations for new adds. How is your proposed functionality different?

Lidarr import of existing library or even grabs/downloads is atrocious. It’s damn near unusable, and a lot of people (myself included) don’t use it because it’s functionally useless if one has to manually import every song or album. I’m not sure it’s worth spending time building anything on top of Lidarr. Thoughts?

The Anna’s archive integration for readarr looks awesome, though. I look forward to trying that out.

A lot of people are only interested in downloading flac for music. Iirc, spotdl doesn’t do flac. Any plans to integrate for example lucida or, I’m not sure if deemix is still working? There have been several successful tools that built on top of deemix in the past, for example deemon, not sure how integration with those would look. Ideally one could add artists lidarr-style, a deezer arl, and the program does the rest (see lidarr-on-steroids).

If you’re using docker it’s easy to set up a second qbittorrent on a different port to meet different needs.

Sure, and let me know how it goes for you. I’m on a dell r720xd, about to upgrade my ram from 128 to 296 gb… don’t want to spend the money for a new gpu right now.

I’ll report back after I try again.

Okay. I finally understand what you mean 🥲

Authenticate a self hosted software stack in someone else’s cloud 😂

That is a wild design choice. Glad it works for some…

Anyway… apologies for being ignorant

My interpretation of your linked instruction (granted, I haven’t tried plex) is that it’s the same two scenarios.

Your plex client app login talks directly to your server login. The client app meeting the server is arranged by the plex relay server and nothing more. There is no ‘logging in’ to the plex relay server; it’s function is to arrange a meeting of two tunnels and that’s it, much like a tailscale derp server.

The relay server is serving the same function as caddy on a VPS, hell, they could even be using tailscale under the hood and it’d look exactly the same to a user.

Anyway, attack vectors even with a public facing jellyfin are mitigated because

a) jellyfin is running in a docker container = a successful attacker would only be able to trash my jellyfin container, which ultimately is not that big of a deal (unless there is a different docker exploit that enables access to the server itself, which is an entirely different issue and larger than a jellyfin/plex discussion)

b) fail2ban in conjunction with a reverse proxy bans malicious ip addresses that come back with too many errors too many times (errors that you, the admin, specify) So, for example, brute force login attacks are mitigated.

c) the reverse proxy itself allows access to only one specified internal ip address/port combination. Pending a caddy exploit (again, a different discussion) it is not possible to fish for acrive ip addresses or port scan my internal network.

I see. So if you read that instruction you’ll see it’s the exact same setup that I outlined. They use a vpn to connect your client to your server and just negotiate the meeting in the middle. It’s the exact same risk scenario as running a reverse proxy on your own vps. Unless I’m missing something else?

I don’t see anything in the linked article about a relay server

Yes exactly. What do you think plex is doing?