• 2 Posts
  • 264 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle






  • It’s been a minute, but off the top of my head:

    • The story was ass.
    • Not enough content for a “live service” game.
    • Enemy levels scaled heavily with your gear level, so better gear didn’t make you feel any more powerful.
    • The stats system for the gear was trash. Like, equipping one piece of high level gear and then keeping your starting gear for everything else was legitimately better than trying to get BiS for all of your gear.
    • Gear had randomly generated buffs, and those might buff other gear. But sometimes it would you would get a drop for something your class could equip (not every class could use every weapon, for example) but with buffs to a weapon your class couldn’t use.
    • For a game that was essentially “be Iron Man” they included an overheat mechanic so you couldn’t just fly wherever you wanted.




  • Billiam@lemmy.worldtoTechnology@lemmy.world*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    Well this is just flat out wrong.

    The fact that people started appending “Reddit” to their search terms to find answers to what they wanted to know would probably be a gigantic indicator that Google’s results without it were less than helpful.

    A useful search engine returns the most relevant result the user wants as fast as possible. An advertising company wants its users to look at as many ads as they can for as long as they’ll tolerate them. Thus it’s apparent the goals of Google (the search engine) are diametrically opposed to the goals of Alphabet (the advertising company).

    So yes, it’s in the best interest of Google’s bottom line to figure out how many ads they can show you (read: before you stop using Google altogether) until they show what might be relevant to you.