From what I gather the texts are encrypted and sent to their LLMs that process it with some mechanism to verify the code being run in the cloud to process the texts is one that the WhatsApp app agreed to.
But they could just as well start siphoning the data after changing that code. Everyone will be able to see the cloud code changed if/when tbat happens but I don’t think there’s a way to differentiate that from a regular update.
Don’t think theyve opensourced any of this
Are people downvoting because the reportrd change sucks or does the article itself suck?
“But why, everyone is on WhatsApp”, and also a lot of businesses. “Privacy? I’ve got nothing to hide, what are they gonna do eith my info?”
Are you saying that for WhatsApp specifically or for online chat in general?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9Ux8DFgMSM
Might give you some ideas on how to do that
Unfortunately “better” varies from person to person. Signal is behind on features, e.g. WhatsApp has integration for businesses (customer support).
I hope my monthly donation will help but we must realize for some some features are important, I guess that for most it’s how many ppl they know is there/unwilling to lead a migration
That makes sense
End users: To access Gemini summary cards, users need to have smart features and personalization smart features in Gmail, Chat, and Meet and smart features in Google Workspace turned on. Visit the Help Center to learn more about collaborating with Gemini in Gmail.
Sounds like it’s an opt in, what am I missing
It also somewhat instils distrust in science IMO, goes along the “eggs were bad for our health just 10y ago” type of argument
I’d recommend reading the article before trying to make a comparison.
When water condenses on surfaces, it usually requires either a drop in temperature or very high humidity levels. Conventional water harvesting methods rely on these principles, often requiring energy input to chill surfaces or a dense fog to form to collect water passively from humid environments. But Lee and Patel’s system works differently.
I wish they’d offer a way to mitigate bias in the summary article since we can’t see if in the actual study requires access to see if the researchers did
Veritasium (youtube) did a piece on this, can’t remember which video it was, might’ve been the one on his thesis of how to teach STEM topics in videos
That’s a good point, forgot about the occasional condescending tone of StackOverflow answers
Define “pleasant”
Yeah fuck that person
I’d assume there are better ways to curb speeding (albeit more expensive), like making the streets narrower and more difficult to drive on. Won’t stop those that run red lights though
No, autism causes vaccines
The article has pics if you want a preview
They might publish components of it enough to verify that the processing code is not emitting any data but as others said - it could’ve been done locally on the phone