

… a flow that can reasonably check itself for errors/hallucinations? There’s no fundamental reason why it couldn’t.
Turing Completeness maybe?
… a flow that can reasonably check itself for errors/hallucinations? There’s no fundamental reason why it couldn’t.
Turing Completeness maybe?
Useless for us, but not for them. They want us to use them like personalised confidante-bots so they can harvest our most intimate data
Absolutely! He simply has a very original take on “freedom”, but we all know that’s a tricky word to pin down, so don’t think about it too much, and leave it to the big dogs to tell you when your freedom is being protected.
They can use the state to do that for them
and the company
Surely the company would never be just as authoritarian as the state!
~ [cue anti-consumer subscription models and user policies]
Say what you want about marxist-leninists but they’re not “very extreme right fascists”. Do you have any evidence for your claim or are you just doing your part in decreasing political literacy?
You could share this sublemmy’s pinned post, or the megathread it links to:
Peertube?
We’re in the age of the technofeudalists
Maybe he could even do a little VR prison tour
In my experience a lot of italian (particularly “news”) websites basically say “accept cookies or sign up for our paid subscription”
It’s not about stealing data, it’s about not letting Zuck gain influence and control of the fediverse.
Right, and that goes for the things it gets “correct” as well, right? I think “bullshitting” can give the wrong idea that LLMs are somehow aware of when they don’t know something and can choose to turn on some sort of “bullshitting mode”, when it’s really all just statistical guesswork (plus some preprogrammed algorithms, probably).