Agree 100%!

We need more Kulturförderung!

I think, with phones, it is very important to factor the size of screen in

720p is fine, but with 7”+ phones, I think, one is happy about having similar DPI compared to the smaller 720p phones.

Jokes on you 😁 my first game I ever played was on a 240 x 160 screen

(2.9”)

So, now we train an AI on a single Release, let it generate that release and share it legally under fair use?

Or let people generate the release themselves under fair use?

🤔

Yea, I always only share a window, so that I not have to change resolution or zoom while in meetings, very valid point

And as well for pricing, I agree (especially if you consider that you need more GPU power for more pixel), but if you are not too picky, you can get a 4k60 screen at sub 300$

1440 27” and 133% seems to me, like you have not much space to have multiple app beside each other?

I most likely sit more near the screen than most people, that may be the reason for my preferences 😄

“PrOtEcT ThE ChiLdReN! 👆🏻🥴”

I can not hear that anymore!

Children need awareness, rather than shielding, concealment and tabooing.

I personally prefer 4k 60 (of course, high hz is better)

I ajust zoom level according screen size, on 32” 4k, I have it mostly around 125% zoom

On my 14” i have, i think, 2550 which as well looks amazing and allows to be usable at 125% as well

I adapt zoom level according on what I am doing, I like having options to go tiny icons and a lot of space or have it big if I am e.g. in a meeting and have to adjust screen distance to be normally visible by the webcam

I need 4k to be happy, with 1080, you have giant windows in you OS (like most apps are only usable in fullscreen) even on 100% and still see single pixels so well…

Straight unusable for me, maybe on a phone with max 5” there 1080 is like a good middle ground (battery vs resolution vs not seeing single pixels)

In an ideal world, there would be something like a universal basic income, which would reduce the pressure on artists that they have to generate enough income with their art, this would allow artists to make art less for mainstream but more unique and thus would, in my opinion, allow to weaken copyright laws

Well, that would be the way I would try to start change.

Acree 100%

Hope we can refactor this whole copyright/patent concept soon…

It is more a pain for artists, creators, releasers etc.

I see it with EDM, I work as a Label, and do sometimes produce a bit

Most artists will work with samples and presets etc. And keeping track of who worked on what and who owns how much percent of what etc. just takes the joy out of creating…

Same for game design: You have a vision for your game, make a poc, and then have to change the whole game because of stupid patent shit not allowing you e.g. not land on a horse and immediately ride it, or throwing stuff at things to catch them…

Yes

At least his aim is shit… lol (talking about this GermaA… dude)

I would not say never, as soon as we have Linux running on it, the floodgates will open

It was the same with the OG switch.

[ This program prints "Hello World!" and a newline to the screen; its
  length is 106 active command characters. [It is not the shortest.]

  This loop is an "initial comment loop", a simple way of adding a comment
  to a BF program such that you don't have to worry about any command
  characters. Any ".", ",", "+", "-", "<" and ">" characters are simply
  ignored, the "[" and "]" characters just have to be balanced. This
  loop and the commands it contains are ignored because the current cell
  defaults to a value of 0; the 0 value causes this loop to be skipped.
]
++++++++                Set Cell #0 to 8
[
    >++++               Add 4 to Cell #1; this will always set Cell #1 to 4
    [                   as the cell will be cleared by the loop
        >++             Add 2 to Cell #2
        >+++            Add 3 to Cell #3
        >+++            Add 3 to Cell #4
        >+              Add 1 to Cell #5
        <<<<-           Decrement the loop counter in Cell #1
    ]                   Loop until Cell #1 is zero; number of iterations is 4
    >+                  Add 1 to Cell #2
    >+                  Add 1 to Cell #3
    >-                  Subtract 1 from Cell #4
    >>+                 Add 1 to Cell #6
    [<]                 Move back to the first zero cell you find; this will
                        be Cell #1 which was cleared by the previous loop
    <-                  Decrement the loop Counter in Cell #0
]                       Loop until Cell #0 is zero; number of iterations is 8

The result of this is:
Cell no :   0   1   2   3   4   5   6
Contents:   0   0  72 104  88  32   8
Pointer :   ^

>>.                     Cell #2 has value 72 which is 'H'
>---.                   Subtract 3 from Cell #3 to get 101 which is 'e'
+++++++..+++.           Likewise for 'llo' from Cell #3
>>.                     Cell #5 is 32 for the space
<-.                     Subtract 1 from Cell #4 for 87 to give a 'W'
<.                      Cell #3 was set to 'o' from the end of 'Hello'
+++.------.--------.    Cell #3 for 'rl' and 'd'
>>+.                    Add 1 to Cell #5 gives us an exclamation point
>++.                    And finally a newline from Cell #6

LinUX like Linus User Experience?

No, they doing it because American capitalism is asocial

They should request private sector to write offers for produce the software and state in the contract that sources have to be FOSS

https://news.itsfoss.com/switzerland-open-source/

How can people support such corruption…

Yea, I would prefer that, a state founded agency which has the order to set up FOSS workspaces.

The tech is already here, all it needs is courage to ditch mega tech coorp.

Everything government must be transparent, in my opinion

Is that not what is happening right now?