data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fd0f2/fd0f22a28104b7dd4abce85ec2d6bf6d589061e9" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1df69/1df69f53f5559e83c288e08b403109544e78dc05" alt=""
1·
4 months agoAh, that makes me feel better. I’ve probably heard of it before, and just never looked into it.
Ah, that makes me feel better. I’ve probably heard of it before, and just never looked into it.
The implication of this being that I am behind the times, stuck on outdated tech, and didn’t even know it is uncomfortable.
They reported 9.9 billion in profit for their third quarter last year, so I think 458 minutes of profit from that quarter.
I assumed 90 days in the quarter, or 129,600 minutes.
So dollar or minute wise, that comes out to a 00.35% penalty to that quarter.
Edit: Which isn’t even close to the 36 minutes in that article, so I’d err on me being the wrong one.
Edit 2: I think I see the difference, I was looking at their profit, not their revenue.
I’m not able to find it again, so it may be entirely bunk, but I remember reading something about the Japanese during early interactions having a stereotype that Europeans didn’t bathe. Obviously this contact was past the medieval stages, but then that makes me ask “Did hygiene become less popular later?”
So, now I’m curious whether this memory is:
A) Pop culture contamination/made up whole cloth, i. e. an author who believed medieval people didn’t bathe and extrapolated it to the 1500s.
B) True, and hygiene did become less popular with Europeans (seems unlikely).
C) Born of the fact that people who have been at sea for so long are not a good representation of overall hygiene.
D) Born from a another factor unrelated to hygiene, but perceived as such by the Japanese. Maybe differences in sweating or diet or something.
E) Some combination of the above.