• 18 Posts
  • 234 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 2nd, 2023

help-circle


  • for some reason i read xfs instead of btrfs…

    their array implementation is stupid and smart at the same time. I love that you can mix and match disks at random, even with different filesystems (you can have one drive in murderfs, one in xfs, one in btrfs and the last one in zfs and all protected with the same parity drive), but i completely hate how my server is locked by a 25% iowait due to how much cpu intensive is their softraid. Maybe when they came out with this system 20 years ago it was groundbreaking, but now it is stupid. Now with unraid 7 released one week ago they’re starting to deprecate it (disabled by default in new install) in favor of native btrfs or zfs arrays


  • a btrfs “array” in unraid is composed by individual btrfs partitions mounted as /mnt/disk1 /disk2 /disk3 and so on, then there’s a daemon that makes a “unified” view at /mnt/user/, and it uses a different algorithm for parity.

    There’s a way to make real btrfs raid arrays, but it has been introduced very recently (1-2 years ago), and it’s not the default that you create when you use the Web UI.



  • If you have new drives: make a zfs array and copy all files there

    If you want to recycle drives while temporarily keeping the parity drives: from unraid 7 set a drive as unused, use the mover (or unbalance) to empty it, check if it’s actually empty by going to /mnt/diskX , format it as btrfs, set it as preferred for your shares, choose another disk to empty, use the mover to move all the data from the next disk to the new btrfs one, then remove the empty drive and add it to the btrfs raid. Repeat.







  • Somehow in Italy many of this sites ask payment with “ricarica Postepay” which is the stupidest payment method ever because:

    1. You can’t do it online but you need to physically go to a post office and waste 30 minutes in an endless queue (ok, you can do it online, but only if you have a checking account with the post office and you enabled all the online services, which not many do because it has higher fees than a regular bank account while not offering the same service level)
    2. You need to give your id card to the clerk and he will record it in the database
    3. You need to give the tax id (similar to SSN) of the receiver
    4. You need to give the debit card PAN of the receiver (except expiration or CVV)

    It’s the most traceable payment method that’s available in the country, I have no idea why so many IPTV resellers on forums and telegram channels use it. Just the fact that the reseller has to publicly give all his personal data to strangers is crazy

    (It’s not designed to be used as a payment method, but a way to send money to a relative or a close friend)

    So I always laugh when the “post police” (yes we have a police corp for post related crimes) or “tax police” (yes we also have a police corp for tax related crimes) say “we arrested a IPTV resellers” because that often just means “a officer just entered in a telegram channel, got all the necessary PII the perpetrator himself, and searched him in the database”

    Edit: first result on Google, can only pay with Bitcoin, ricarica Postepay and bank transfer and in order to proceed you need to send a text message to their fucking WhatsApp

    All of three methods are ultra traceable (ok, compared to the “ricarica Postepay”, Bitcoin is a bit harder)

    This website has the audacity of saying “Sicurezza e Anonimato con protezioni a livello militare con noi sei al sicuro” (safe and anonymous, with military grade encryption) - anonymous what, need to give phone number and tax id in order to proceed…

    Edit 2: news from two weeks ago. 23 users paid for IPTV using that stupid ultra-traceable payment method and of course they were caught in seconds with a simple database search. Prosecutor wanted to give them 2-8 years for “fencing”, judge said “personal use isn’t a crime” https://www.fanpage.it/sport/calcio/il-pezzotto-per-vedere-calcio-in-tv-e-illecito-ma-non-reato-13-pirati-puniti-solo-con-una-multa/

    So if real users got acquitted, victims of an entrapment site will be too, as there’s no crime at all







  • the reason OP was thinking of doing this, was saving disk space and avoiding buying another hdd. So if it’s a 1:1 full disk image, then there’s almost no difference with the costs of raid1. Setting exclusions, avoiding certain big files, and so on. In this case he’s talking about restic, which can restore data but very hard to do a full bootable linux system - stuff needs to be reinstalled