Oh yeah the LLM that is built to make things up at the drop of a hat can also make up the sources, its wild that people can still trust a literal machine of lies.

I saw one the other day that stated AC and DC power where interchangeable…

The amount of times I see people just take what is outputted as gospel is scary. And on things with real risk like electrical repair!

The ability to make shit up helps as well.

As is tradition

Good? Also is the american car sector not already dead from the us becoming a tariff issueing pariah state?

The how is testing on one other browser.

“Where are my balls Summer?”

It does not say a dog can not play basketball.

Wait, you can eat heath care?

Oh no! You are going to make your platform work like ass? And you expect us to do mental gymnastics in such a way that instead of blaming you (you know the one that has control over the platform) we blame uBlock? The same uBlock that has made using your platform bearable for many years, to the point that I will sit in silence with the screen off instead of watch with ads?

I think even if you make us wait a min before playing the video most would take that over an ad.

That is OK we can wait.

But we need to fail faster, and be agile into the cloud!

Its funny (and terrifying) that people, even professionals don’t understand how the lie machine works.

They did the same for me when my mother passed (no AI, just assholes though).

If its as light as the first one, all I can say is “YARRRG”

Well yeah, when ai started to give people info so wrong it cost the companies money this was going to happen.

And wildly dishonest to try and spin every campaign as having some choice on whether or not to deploy violence. To top it off, the flat out writing off of all unsuccessful non-violent campaigns as if they don’t matter (even though most failed campaigns of these types result in people in cells regardless of if violence was employed or not)

And unless they have very good parameters there have to be countless non-violent and ineffective campaigns.

If you did this as a ratio of failures over success the non-violent numbers would be sky high compared to the violent ones, the rate of failure would indicate violence is the way.

This whole thing seems like a really wordy way of saying “don’t resist”.

…all violent and nonviolent campaigns from 1900 to 2006 that resulted in the overthrow of a government or in territorial liberation. They created a data set of 323 mass actions.

323, in over 100 years. And they are exuding campaigns that did not work? I would assume there have been 10s of thousands of protests in that time that where non-violent and also ineffective. Why are they not included? What would make a campaign go from non-violent to violent? What constitutes a campaign, is it non-violent in whole or only part? I would check but I need to buy their book.

I can not even think of any movement that resulted in territorial or government change that did not involve some form of violence. This study does not seem to pass the sniff test.

Yeah I could not comment so quick unless I programmed something to do it for me…