Yeah which is absurd, considering every other phone and mobile device (e.g. PS Vita) had OLEDs since 2011 at the latest.

You’d think with how often android is updated ridding us of this technical debt is very easy. Disable multicast DNS, add a hidden setting tucked away in a menu somewhere to re-enable it. Ez pz.

No it must not lol what? The RFC says “may”.

And more importantly the devices don’t, it’s very noticeable via wireshark. The only multicast traffic comes from Android, every other OS does not bother, ironically not even Mac OS, whom is responsible for the whole Avahi/Bonjour nonsense to start with.

That would make the names much longer but would protect me against some asshat buying .lan as a new gTLD.

Another user pointed out that .home.arpa seems to be reserved, thus hopefully protected from TLD hijack which is what I’m worried about as well. I’d make it .homelab. I wonder if one can restrict recursion on certain domains?

If one server is marked as authoritative, but to recurse for other things, will it recurse for it’s authoritative domain, or give NXDOMAIN?

I do own a domain name via cloudflare so I might just utilize that, but I don’t like it.

It’s assigned in my local DNS server, cheers.

My devices should not be going around making assumptions about what is and isn’t assigned by someone else somewhere when the only thing that should concern them is what the DNS server tells them is the case.

Also NAT does literally nothing other than being a massive PITA, so… yeah, I don’t think there’s much I can agree with in your rant.

Only true if you don’t know what you’re doing. The only reason any network is safe at all is NAT and Firewalls that come with it.

I don’t have to worry about devices on a local network in as far as firewalls go, I can expose anything I want, in fact I delete iptables at first sight on any new distro install or VM, so long as none of it is port forwarded and everything is behind NAT it’s all okay. My network is my castle. Thanks technology! Thanks smart people for figuring this out!

Once you wrap your head around the fact your computer has IPs assigned statically or by DHCP per interface per network, not like a MAC address per device as IPv6 wants it to be which is the wrong way to think, you won’t have any more trouble with NAT.

Like, oh no, fully functional point to point connectivity across the internet, how terrible

Yes when you start out you may think so, but as you get into it you realise that actually complexity exists because it serves a purpose. IPv6 has to bolt on privacy extensions and then also still include NAT and actual tons of space for loopback because it’s fundamentally incompatible with how the internet works otherwise.

And yes, practically it’s a security nightmare to have any IP of any computer accessible from the internet. If you go around configuring firewalls forever you might get it right but oh boy one mistake and you’re done for. Instead, consider NAT, the solution to all problems. I’m writing this behind quadruple NAT rn and it’s honestly fairly easy to manage, I’ve been too lazy to change it, not that I’d advise anything more than 1 necessarily.

Edit: .home.arpa is actually designated as local TLD, and is what I use for a crappy old tablet that doesn’t support mDNS

Yikes! That’s a lot to type to hammer in a nail that sticks out (Android). Thanks but no thanks. I’ll find some way to cripple mDNS on the non-compliant device instead.

So are you saying you run some sort of mDNS server(not sure what the word would be there)/provider? Why? How?

So why does Google enforce mDNS when it leads to this confusion?

Everywhere else, Windows, Linux, iOS, etc etc. as far as I can tell mDNS doesn’t happen with .local as the default, nevermind only option.

Only the android devices throw a fit because of Google enforcing bizarre legacy technology of use to no one.

Maybe there’s a way to hint to the problematic android devices that it’s a no-no by restricting all multicast traffic of any kind on network level? Is that even possible?

Meh that sucks. There was a mod for ME3 that gave Miranda more of a role and it used the voice files from the game as source material for AI training for dialogue in the mod. Having that be hampered because of some DRM loicense so the Hollywood people can buy more mansions isn’t something I’d like to see.

Course they do. So do users, nah? Files are files. Once you give someone info you can’t really take it back.

…I don’t see how this has any relevancy at all, since the whole purpose of an LLM is to make new – arguably derivative – works on an industrial scale, not just single copies for personal use.

Because it’s the same basic reason that hard-drives are legal. With a hard drive and a PC I can make practically infinite copies of copyrighted material off e.g. a DVD.

Only the wrongful redistribution of such copies is an actual crime, not providing the tooling for it, otherwise Seagate or whatever HDD manufacturer would be liable for copyright infringement I commit using it’s drives, so would my ISP if I distributed it etc etc.

The ruling was particularly clear: the basis for why VCRs were allowed to stay was because they had non-infringing uses. Same with hard drives.

I’m sure you see where I’m going with this. Because LLMs can allow you to generate things that (regardless of your opinion on whether all outputs are theft) wouldn’t stand up to substantial similarity tests in court, they have non-infringing uses.

Therefore, it’s the person who prompts and generates the image of copyright infringing material that’s responsible, not the researcher, patent-holder, programmer, dataset provider, supplier or distributor of the LLM.

To be clear, I think it ought to be the case

Fair enough, thanks for the clarification.

Thank you, I’m glad someone is sane ITT.

To further refine the point, do you know of any lawsuits that were ruled successfully on the basis that as you say - the company that made the LLM is responsible because someone could prompt it to reproduce identifiable chunks of copyright material? Which specific bills make it so?

Wouldn’t it be like suing Seagate because I use their hard drives to pirate corpo media? I thought Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc. would serve as the basis there and just like Betamax it’d be distribution of copyright material by an end user that would be problematic, rather than the potential of a product to be used for copyright infringement.

Training LLMs on copyright material isn’t illegal to begin with, just like how learning from a pirated book isn’t or having drugs in your system isn’t, only being in possession of these things is illegal.

GDPR violations are on the other hand - illegal. You’re right in principle, don’t get me wrong and I appreciate your healthy cynicism but in this particular case being slapped with a GDPR fine is actually not worth keeping the data of one user.

Edit: Downvoted for being right as usual. Bruh Lemmy is becoming more and more like Reddit every day.

It’s a shame, it was a good app but if you haven’t bailed already now is as good a time as any.

Well she ain’t too smart then cuz now she has to pay rent so I’d say we’re even

I’m glad someone made it but it’s just not a great value proposition.

Even if it shipped to the EU where OLED devices have usually been more popular (less iPhones), it’s a crappy 16:9 shorter screen, it looks like a bit of a pain to install and it’s really expensive.

It’s kinda wild to me there ever was an LCD steam deck to begin with, even my last handheld - the Vita - had OLED, but I guess they wanted it to be as cheap as possible which is admirable.

Oh dear. Well thanks!

Idk I honestly don’t even know which iPhone is latest anymore, my gut says 8 but I know that there’s also iPhone X which was somehow the first one with an OLED screen and why I remember it.

Last one I owned was the 5S, great phone, but their branding and looks haven’t appealed to me since then.

Bruh. Meanwhile I’m still with my free and libre Mistral-7B I refined using my own WhatsApp messages and I almost never use it…

Maybe, but SysV Init was just fucking awful. It’s a shame.

What’s weird about the image? It shows up as a trollface to me. Are you like, 14?

This just makes your house a target for robbery because the criminals who deliver on the side will think you have lots of money

Americans be crazy. I never tipped in my life and ain’t about to start.