Work as in actually help meet people? Not really.

I did hear about that.

I always wondered if they realised we actually can’t send the first message.

There’s a big problem with the “women message first” gimmick, and it’s that they just don’t.

If they don’t simply let the match expire, you either get a shitty Gif, or something along the lines of “hey.”

Maybe one in ten will actually send a message that genuinely starts a conversation.

☝️🤓 Well, actually…

This is such a weird position to take, they’re doing investigative journalism, but you’re upset because they’re not dry and emotionless about it?

Well, that’s just sad.

Also, does this person actually want a partner, with thoughts and opinions of their own, or something that fits their idea of an “ideal” partner, and will never disagree with them or challenge them?

Weirdly enough, the best manufacturers for minimum bloat ware are the Chinese brands. Doogee and Ulefone have the bare minimum, just the basic Google apps.

You got taught how to rewire a plug in high school?

Some of them do, photoelectric ones don’t.

Same here, but I’d still be pretty annoyed if I had to do it to put together a drone, it’s a pain in the ass.

Yep, it’s still someone else’s platform, even if it’s open source.

Nobody is reading that text wall even if a human wrote it.

Who’s forcing you to read half baked reckons on FB?

“It’s not right that things can be said on TV or the floor of Congress, but not on our platforms,”

I somewhat respect that statement actually.

He won the popular vote, you can’t blame that on gerrymandering.

What business though?

What is the use case for a $200 a month AI subscription? It’s a lot of money to spend on a novelty, clearly people are finding it useful.

That’s a very plausible theory actually.

I mean, most of the points you came out with are nonsense, and not worth dignifying with a response.

Especially considering a dead Starlink satellite will deorbit and burn up in under a decade, because they fly so low.