I think this rate limiting mechanism is mostly a niceness rule : you should try to not put too much pressure on any website and obey the rules defined in its robots.txt.
So I guess this idea is not bad as it would mostly penalize bad players.
I think this rate limiting mechanism is mostly a niceness rule : you should try to not put too much pressure on any website and obey the rules defined in its robots.txt.
So I guess this idea is not bad as it would mostly penalize bad players.
deleted by creator
And didn’t they explicitly state that they went down because “the US government is not working on a solution”, 12h before this government changed?
To be fair, you haven’t invented fascism.
Although, in France we have a sort of proverb that says that what happens in the US happens here 10 years later. I hope we will manage to dodge what’s coming at us, this time…
It felt miraculous for me that, for a while, tech companies appeared to comply to regulation (doing the bare minimum, as slowly as possible, but it kinda worked).
My hypothesis is that they now except political support from Trump administration and to pressure the EU?
I wanted to leave a while ago but their shitty development practices got me locked out of my account due to a bug before I could.
I think to claim to make an effort about that, I’m pretty sure I saw changelog about AI content detection at least for the image section.
Like, we will be able to make negative feedback about a video again? Oh no nevermind it’s just bs again…
Maybe the goal is to get Musk to buy Bluesky and start all over again 🤷
Idk, but in EU I think this wouldn’t be a legitimate use of such sensitive data.
“It is easy for an underaged purchaser to go online and click they are of legal age, purchase ammunition, and have it shipped to their house,” added Magers
WTF America, do amo marketplaces really have the same security standards as p**nhub ?
I’m much more impressed by the fact that a type can implement PartialEq and not Eq. Now that’s nice design!
I’ve lost faith in Qwant a few years ago, but this gives me some hope 😀
I agree that it’s suspicious. This is a HUGE number that would imply a drastic change in their development process and I’m surprised that they don’t give much more information, especially since (as you said) it would promote their product.
Not disappointed by The Verge, first paragraph paraphrases the title with no source and the following is just off topic.
I’d be surprised if it wasn’t a bit more subtle than that. While the medium really facilitate the behavior that you describe, I’m pretty sure that it also hosts sane usages, creative content and positive communities.
So if it’s true, Tim Cook isn’t thrilled about strong regulation? What a surprising and breaking news from the CEO of an no-so-far-from-monopolistic company!
Trump really sounds like a child complaining that his parents forbid him to play video games after 8pm.
What kind of innovation do you have in mind?
I’ve seen much pointless dumb shit these last days, but this one still manages to shine.