

AI was never meant for the average person but the average person had to be convinced it was for funding.
Nowadays everybody wants to talk like they got something to say but nothing comes out when they move their lips just a bunch of gibberish.
AI was never meant for the average person but the average person had to be convinced it was for funding.
If those are your reservations about Nuclear power educate yourself on the process’ taken with Nuclear waste, how much waste is produced per MW produced, and then compare MW produced vs impact for other energy sources.
Whatever you say buddy.
Building Wind, Solar, and Hydro is worse than doing nothing because of the massive environmental impacts they have.
We also have technologies like Modular Nuclear Reactors which can produce up to 300 MW of power per unit and be factory built.
Fact of the matter is we have the solution but ignoramus’ who don’t understand Science once again oppose human advancement and survival, without even considering sacrificing all of their energy dependent toys that Science built and are more dangerous than Nuclear Energy.
The amount of resources needed to build and maintain wind, solar, and hydro coupled with the massive environmental impacts make all three something that shouldn’t be considered for long term “green” solutions.
I think the big problem is our species went too far too fast, and it was all luck. Couple that with a species that is generally ignorant and unwilling to educate themselves, and we are left with global issues so convoluted that even our smartest struggle to manage them.
I cannot even entertain this “debate” anymore because there isn’t one. Nuclear is superior across the board, even when we include renewables like solar and wind, and I am tried of people not getting that while the world burns.
It’s funny because you said “works with” and not “owned like a dog by”. haha
Trump working with the Russians is not news.
Every country does need to get their shit together yesterday though.
AI has numerous applications in the Sciences, and is incredibly useful and worthwhile when it is applied correctly.
The problem is the majority of people are uneducated or under-educated, so useful things like AI get turned into toys to appease Grown Babies.
I find it weird that one can sign in to codeberg with a github account.
Well, I googled exactly that and as I knew, it doesn’t say what you propose. Can you explain what the fuck you mean? Free will has no evidence nor does no free will. It’s a philosophical question and science can only confirm that we make choices. Your hostile arguments are so hard to interpret. What do you mean. No, there is not more evidence that we do. What evidence? Why is it so easy to find and basic to you that you become angry, yet it turns out you made it up? Can you elaborate?
Stop projecting the fact that you are ignorant and angry on to others, and instead educate yourself and seek therapy.
Don’t expect further response.
Your argument is that you don’t have to provide proof that free will has been solved because it is easy to Google it.
No.
My point is that free will has not been “solved” but there is more evidence that humans do not have it than there is evidence that we do. It has yet to be determined one way or the other.
This isn’t an argument, it is a fact.
Hahaha yeah the philosophy of free will is solved and you can just Google it
Show me where I said that.
That’s not a mature argument
Learn what an argument is because I haven’t made one.
feels like a very reddit interaction, this doesn’t belong on lemmy imo
Your comment is more useless than the one demanding “proof” of something that isn’t proven either way, and very much adds to the “Reddit” vibes that in your opinion do not belong here.
I guess you should see yourself out by your own standards eh?
Yeah, no.
You can go ahead and produce the “proof” you have that humans have free will because I am not wasting my time being your search engine on something that has been heavily studied. Especially when I know nothing I produce will be understood by you simply based on the fact that you are demanding “proof” free will does not exist when there is no “proof” that it does in the first place.
I tend not to waste my time sourcing Scientific material for unscientific minds.
Prove it.
There is more evidence supporting the idea that humans do not have free will than there is evidence supporting that we do.
People tend to highly underestimate the people they do not know, over estimate how unique their personal experience is, and demand external variables be tailored to their personal tastes.
Users spend real money to buy creators virtual gifts, which can then be cashed out as fiat currency, with TikTok retaining 50% of the payout.
Should probably read the article before ceding your point.
It seems that they think that if they scream “AI” loud enough and pretend it is sentient no one will know that most of the world working towards automated intelligence are now aiming for an Intelligent Agent, or “IA”, and the general census seems to be IA wont be achievable with current AI models.
Also “IA” wouldn’t need a button. It would just dip.