That there is no perfect defense. There is no protection. Being alive means being exposed; it’s the nature of life to be hazardous—it’s the stuff of living.
Is CORBA even used these days? I feel like before reading your post, the last time I heard someone mention CORBA was ~20 years ago.
Who is going to ask you?
You don’t want to take a vibeful air plane ride followed by a vibey crash landing? You’re such a square and so behind the times.
It’s actually a lie on the part of Nvidia. One of those corporate “it’s not technically a lie”, but there is still a clear premeditated intention to deceive stemming from malicious intent.
These mother fucking AI pump and dump promoters. He full well knows what he is saying makes no sense. Why would an ML algorithm solution find a job unpleasant? I doesn’t know or feel anything.
Amodei is trying to anthropomorphize their service (to play into the notion of AI being completely revolutionary) in order to keep the grift going.
A damning result for AI pump and dump scammers.
I am not denying Starlink and SpaceX have a dominant market position.
When I said “this is a very soviet mode of thinking,” I meant that it’s unreasonable to think that they are unbeatable.
This is just one thing, but if you use Starlink or SpaceX you have to deal with Americans and Americans cannot be trusted.
Being a reliable partner is a competitive advantage and has an impact on the cost function of a given relationship. Americans (government or companies) are not reliable.
SpaceX and Starlink have no competitors
This is a very soviet mode of thinking.
They have one strong competitive advantage that Starlink will never have; they are not American.
By definition, you cannot trust an American service. Even if the people who run a given service are not degenerates, there are enough degenerates in the US that they could elect a degenerate who will fuck you over.
They have both GEO and LEO satellites. Not on the scale of Starlink (for LEO), but they do have a network.
I am not commenting on the nature of the stock market or anything like that. Just pointing out that they do have a working network, it’s not 100% speculation (like you see with crypto schemes).
I was referring to the locals thinking a Chinese company had something to do with communism.
“fears of communism”
There is an abstract beauty to this level of confident ignorance.
I just edited this part: It’s a collaboration between several clowns.
😜 🤪
This is a parody website!
It’s a collaboration between several clowns.
But a spreadsheet can function like a database. 🤣
Not if there is a BACKUP folder with daily copies of all your spreadsheets.
Sifting through the backups is so much fun when you’re trying to find when a particular issue started.
It’s not the worst option available, it might not be the cleanest solution, but it does offer a level of flexibility if you have an in-depth understanding of key operational (or financial) business processes.
Just goes to show that a spreadsheet is a very powerful tool.🤣
The US made one is the real issue. 😆
People going through US immigration (I did this maybe ~20 years ago as a student) will just make a temp, low-use account or something similar.
What a bunch of PR word salad.
I skimmed through most to the article, it reads like a oligarch propaganda piece. But in the BBC’s defense they did ask some relevant questions.
In particular, Mayer’s framing of “pessimists” and “optimists” is almost beautiful in an abstract kind of way.
It is not a matter of being pessimistic or optimistic about ML powered services, it’s a matter of not trusting a bunch of vapid, corrupt, dishonest ghouls like Mayer and her ilk.
Only a complete fool would believe the word salad about wanting to make the world a better place and leveraging technology to help develop human connections. It reads like a parody or satire.