return2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前4-year campaign backdoored iPhones using possibly the most advanced exploit everarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square57fedilinkarrow-up1540arrow-down19
arrow-up1531arrow-down1external-link4-year campaign backdoored iPhones using possibly the most advanced exploit everarstechnica.comreturn2ozma@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 年前message-square57fedilink
minus-squareGlitzyArmrest@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up35·1 年前Seems like the definition of advanced persistent threat.
minus-squarepsud@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up30arrow-down2·1 年前It isn’t persistent over a reboot, but the tested devices received new corrupted iMessages immediately after reboot
minus-squareGlitzyArmrest@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up26·edit-21 年前Persistent in APT isn’t referring to the malware itself, but rather the threat actor. I meant that this seems like a textbook APT actor.
minus-squareElias Griffin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·1 年前You know what else was also super sophisticated, chained, and confident enough in it’s APT to not be persistent across reboots? DOUBLEPULSAR.
minus-square██████████@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·1 年前Reminded me restart all my devices
Seems like the definition of advanced persistent threat.
It isn’t persistent over a reboot, but the tested devices received new corrupted iMessages immediately after reboot
Persistent in APT isn’t referring to the malware itself, but rather the threat actor. I meant that this seems like a textbook APT actor.
You know what else was also super sophisticated, chained, and confident enough in it’s APT to not be persistent across reboots? DOUBLEPULSAR.
You sure?
Reminded me restart all my devices