TehBamski@lemmy.world to Gaming@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoActivision to pay $23.4m for patent infringementwww.gamesindustry.bizexternal-linkmessage-square7fedilinkarrow-up155arrow-down11
arrow-up154arrow-down1external-linkActivision to pay $23.4m for patent infringementwww.gamesindustry.bizTehBamski@lemmy.world to Gaming@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square7fedilink
minus-squarermstyle@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 year agoYes, look at the ars article, there are even links to the patents. https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2024/05/jury-finds-activision-blizzard-liable-in-23-4m-patent-infringement-case/
minus-squareonlinepersona@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoThe Ars article is definitely better than the gamesindustry.biz one. Patent trolls for sure. Also, what the fuck is that patent? They are describing a multi-cast over unicast, which is basically a for loop over the participants. Friggin ridiculous. Anti Commercial-AI license
Yes, look at the ars article, there are even links to the patents. https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2024/05/jury-finds-activision-blizzard-liable-in-23-4m-patent-infringement-case/
The Ars article is definitely better than the gamesindustry.biz one. Patent trolls for sure.
Also, what the fuck is that patent? They are describing a multi-cast over unicast, which is basically a for loop over the participants. Friggin ridiculous.
Anti Commercial-AI license