jeffw@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoJudge mulls sanctions over Google’s “shocking” destruction of internal chatsarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up1366arrow-down17
arrow-up1359arrow-down1external-linkJudge mulls sanctions over Google’s “shocking” destruction of internal chatsarstechnica.comjeffw@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square37fedilink
minus-squareRubberDuck@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up48·edit-21 year agoActively destroying evidence should mean automatic inferral of the worst.
minus-squareNeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down1·edit-21 year agoOnly if you are able to imagine the worst.
minus-squarePossibly linux@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down28·1 year agoUntil you get arrested for using encryption
minus-squareWomble@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up24·1 year agoUsing encryption has essentially nothing in common with deleting records while under investigation.
minus-squarePossibly linux@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down6·1 year agoIf they deleted records that’s different. What it sounds like is that they just turned off logging when discussing sensitive topics. That isn’t a great practice in this case but at the same time that shouldn’t automatically make them guilty.
Actively destroying evidence should mean automatic inferral of the worst.
Only if you are able to imagine the worst.
Dreadfully true
Until you get arrested for using encryption
Using encryption has essentially nothing in common with deleting records while under investigation.
If they deleted records that’s different. What it sounds like is that they just turned off logging when discussing sensitive topics. That isn’t a great practice in this case but at the same time that shouldn’t automatically make them guilty.