• Modva@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Peoples jobs will always be sacrificed to make that quarterly earnings call sound sweet to investors.

    Profits above all.

    • onlinepersona@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even ditching quarterly reporting won’t help :/ Should the SEC ditch quarterly reporting?

      IMO worker-owned businesses should be the future. There should also be a forced role-switch or shadowing for managers and workers, so that both understand better what each others respective jobs look like. Managers often think they should be earning their money because their work is more important and set the salaries as such: “Without me, you wouldn’t know what to do, so my job is more important should be compensated more”. They are out of touch with their workers and their realities.

      Anti Commercial AI thingy

      CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

  • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The function of a public company is to create growth for its shareholders…

    And that’s fine

    Dammit the duality of man

  • Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    In my opinion game studios should not sell out to investors and/or have any stocks as it will lead to profit making the calls eventually. It is tempting to get a bunch of investment, I know it would make my game studio easier to run right now, but then you are constantly reminded how it all ends up. Don’t like the system, stop playing in it and build your company slowly and organically instead and retain full control.

    Same goes for many businesses outside of gaming. Imagine if there was no such thing as the stock market / investors and all companies had to grow on their own merits.

    In my virtual studio everyone is their own sole proprietorship contributing to the project off and on and getting compensated fairly for their contributions. They also have their own projects too and may even pay me to help them sometimes. This way everyone assumes their own risk and reaps their own benefits. If any one person on the virtual team has a hit with their project, they retain full control and owe no money back to some shareholders who did nothing but lend money to make money. It does mean I am way slower than if I could just hire everyone full time as employees, but knowing where having investors will ultimately take me, I accept. Plus going slower means more time to sit on things and polish and not feel time pressure to appease shareholders.

    Shareholders are a little like getting a loan and depending on how successful you are, you have to pay back more than you borrowed and giving them control on your art. No thanks.

  • Philote@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t work in the industry and I could be way off here. But aren’t some of the developers hired on as a type of contract worker to finish a big game and well aware that if the next project isn’t lined up perfectly, it’s impossible to house that many employees. That’s how our construction industry is. Companies have to hire on and then trim the fat as needed.

    • Urist@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sadly, they are most likely forced to sell their labor for survival short term and hence cannot even invest their own time for the purpose of making something truly great.

        • lad@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          On a tangential note, I doubt that the license you include will have any influence on people doing scraping for commercial AI :(

          Also, I am not sure what is the default licence the content on forums/lemmy is posted under and if that can be changed by including an overriding licence 🤔

          • onlinepersona@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I doubt that the license you include will have any influence on people doing scraping for commercial AI :(

            That doesn’t deter me. It’s just a keystroke to insert 🤷 If someday I read that the EU or the US decided anything can be used to train AI, then I’d stop.

            Anti Commercial AI thingy

            CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

            • Urist@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I like it. It reminds me that Lemmy is a small space and that people on the internet are not bots, so we have to be nice to each other :) Plus it is always fun seeing you around in different threads.