SpaceX projected 20 million Starlink users by 2022—it ended up with 1 million::Starlink has a fraction of the projected $12B revenue and 20M users, WSJ says.

  • Uniquitous@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    They’re about to lose another one. We finally got fiber run to our area, so now I have internet that doesn’t zone out every 5 - 10 minutes to find another satellite. Canceling Starlink next week. Fuck you Elon.

  • exohuman@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    They haven’t done a great job of marketing it. $100-120 a month isn’t bad and it beats the pants off of all the other satellite internet services.

  • SpaceBar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    My internet where I live is through cable and it’s terrible. Bad. Outtages all of the time. Down for days at times. So I switched to starlink. It’s fine. Works great EXCEPT WHEN IT RAINS HEAVILY.

    Heavy rain blocks the signal. Elon Musk owns it.

    Now, I have a t-mobile hotspot. It’s only $50 per month as opposed to the $110 for Starlink.

    If you have no other decent option, Starlink is amazing. If you have other options, don’t give Musk your money.

  • KJ118@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I was hyped when I first learned about starlink, finally I wouldn’t be stuck with 1 Mbps from ATT, then my power co-op announced it would be running gig fiber to all customers homes.

    • dhtseany@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah, I’ve worked in data centers a fair amount in my day and I can’t believe they allowed Musk to do any of that to begin with. Every data center experience I’ve ever had was met with a thousand rules that were meant to keep the customer safe and I cannot believe they were authorized to do this in any fashion.

      It’s not about whether they owned the equipment or not, it’s about the fact that they violated policies and procedures that were put in place to safeguard other clients and the privacy of their data. Total bullshit if you ask me and I’d be suing the data center afterwards if I was one of their primary clients for the breach of trust.

  • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I was the perfect target for the service, the wife and I went as far as downloading the app to get telemetry from our house, we were like 20% covered and decided to hold off just a little while longer. Then musk went jacking it on the corner in San Diego levels crazy, we pay just about as much for our current Internet (and it’s mobile hotspot backup plan in case the internet goes out and we have vital work that needs to be done, or I need some low latency gaming time) which is 5 mb/s on its best days, and we’re very happy to not be supporting that Russian stooge.

  • scala@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Private infrastructure owned by that megalomaniac is not good.

    • makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      If there was another option I’d take it. As it is though, I’m travelling around Australia and it’s freaking brilliant. Australia has zero coverage for most of the country outside of the towns and city regions. I can park up in total outback with no phone reception and get anywhere from 150 to 400 Mbps. I couldn’t do this without it, so I’ll take it, as it’s the only option