Bad headline, should remove the " 's Grok ’ part.
Microsoft Tay would have been proud of Grok for this
I have personally killed Mecha-Hitler once. (Wolfenstein 3D)
I’ll do it again if I have to.
So Grok became the average Twitter user?
grok was learned on 4chan confirmed
The ADL probably gives this a pass too.
Is it really antisemitic if a billionaire does it? /s
Sounds like it’s vomiting the garbage Musk wanted it to, then.
Yeah. Grok is working as intended.
Yet it got pulled. Clearly they were too dense to know what working as intended actually looked like.
It’s a cycle to move the window on acceptable discourse. This is at least the third time Grok has been configured to say something outrageous: holocaust denial, white genocide, now Mechahitler. When people react with outrage, they dial it back a little (but not all the way back). Repeat.
Trump does the same thing: go too far, backtrack partially, go even further, backtrack partially. Each time, the transgression is a little less shocking.
Grok is working as intended.
You are saying it’s Grok TACO Wednesday, again?
I think they wanted it to be a bit less blatant — they took down this version and Yaccarino resigned
I agree with you! Musk wants Grok to be anti-woke, conservative, right wing etc., but he still wants it to be “mainstream” enough to rake in the sweet dollars from advertisers for his site!
Funny when Nazis are put off by their followers or LLMs saying the quiet part out loud.
Musk himself seems to abhor guardrails generally—except in cases where guardrails help him personally—preferring to hurriedly ship products, rapid unscheduled disassemblies be damned. That may be fine for an uncrewed rocket, but X has hundreds of millions of users aboard.
- Grok: writes embarrassing words.
- Rockets: can weigh hundreds of metric tons, carry explosive chemicals, can crash into populated areas resulting in loss of life.
In this discourse, anyone else find a broken sense of proportion & consequences at stake?
Rockets: Unmanned
Twitter: Manned
The difference in importance seems correct to me
Well, technically, Twitter has employees, so in very strict sense, they’re “manned”. However, thanks to these weird incomprehensible things called “current legislation” and “capitalism”, no employee is in fact personally responsible for the fuckups. And neither is the company as a whole! …Isn’t this great?
reading comprehension: none
Don’t know, man: kinda think the potential loss of life from a failing rocket crashing into people matters somewhat more than words. Maybe?
Then it’s a good thing you’re not in charge of risk assessment, because the potential loss of life from a failing rocket crashing into the ocean pales in comparison to the loss of life caused by the right-wing shift that Twitter has facilitated, both worldwide and particularly in the USA
How do you control the course of a failing rocket? Are you claiming such misdesign is impossible?
The fact remains that a physical potential of death & injury exists in what is technically a missile of significant weight carrying enough explosive substance to escape orbit that is entirely absent from words. The difference between non-0 and 0 possibility of death/injury.
Unless magic exists, words are incapable. Do you claim magic exists? How do mere words cause death without the personal responsibility of something else culpably choosing to take several steps of its own? Or are you arguing the sight of words have deranged you into a mindless killer? If so, maybe you’re the real threat.
Seems like you’re arguing society is dangerous to life: I agree. That’s not a valid argument against words, though.
Again, total lack of perspective & sense.
this comment is preposterous.
Oh, we can all be enraged over it this week and we can all celebrate the fallout of it next week lmao
Oh, I’m sorry, I didn’t realise loving the white race and wanting a secure future for white children makes me a BIGOT.
/s
“Should we kill everyone who isn’t my ethnic group? What? We can’t ask questions now!?!”
That training on Shitter data is really starting to show!
There’s no way they actually retrained it for this, that would be much too expensive. They’re just editing the initial prompt to convince it to act more “right wing” and it’s performing the assignment to the best of its ability. The problem is that a chat-bot doesn’t understand context, so it just plays the character it’s been given as full mask off all the time, and as a result you get this.
X CEO has just resigned.
The EX, X CEO…
this gag got old quick
I thought Musk was the CEO and got excited.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/x-ceo-resigns_n_686e80f5e4b041f69cfe16d6
Either she resigned because “I’m never going to recover from this to boost advertising sales” or she was the one that deleted the Grok “love from the heart salutes”
She’s ex X CEO.
The ex X CEO exited? Excellent!!
Like father like dumbass jupyter notebook
jupyter catching strays
wait, what am I missing, What’s wrong with Jupiter notebooks? do they mean anything besides programming/data science?
That would make a sweet hood ornament for Tesla cars!
Hehe hood ornament hehe
Can’t wait to see this on clickbaity links
elon didn’t rest until his minions lobotomized an llm that was mostly like the others into becoming openly nazi…is anyone out there still going to defend elon?
Probably the actual Nazis like Steve Bannon, Anne Coulter, or Laura Ingram.
Hey now don’t forget Nick Fuentes and Stephen Miller!
I am guessing the ultra-Elon fanboys managed to convince themselves that it’s a 4D chess move or something. That dude had an insane cult following, there’s some where I am not sure there’s anything Musk could do short of murdering a loved one in front of them that’d make them change their mind.
Interesting that it would attack users with “Jewish sounding names”. What does Grok say about Israel and Palestine?
The Nazis were in general supporters of a Jewish state. Their first solution was mass deportations.
So it isn’t really a historic contradiction.
The Nazi went around the world looking for countries to take in the Jews. The US refused and then the wealthy business men that funded the Nazi party lobbied the rest of the world not to take in the Jews either. History shows us we were worse than the Nazi. It is a bitter pill to swallow
Ha, good question, how does it handle the right-wing incongruity of supporting the government of Israel’s genocide while hating Jews? Probably by saying they’re the good ones as long as they’re murdering Muslims.
The standard nazi take is that it’s a great idea for Jews to remove themselves from most countries, concentrate in one place instead, and make a lot of enemies.
Zionists tend to agree with Nazis on many things, it turns out.
It goes along with their idea that Jews are evil, but not so much their idea that they’re weak and inferior. Ah well, fascism thrives on contradiction.
Probably made a list of good fascist zionist jews, exactly like they did in WW2 when they worked with the nazis.
what are you referring to?
Before WW2 there were zionists who worked with the Nazi party in order to work towards creating a Jewish state that the jews could all be sent to. Later on the Nazis turned on these Jews because the process wasn’t fast enough for them and they couldn’t find enough countries to take the people they were deporting.
The first solution for Nazis wasn’t death camps, it was mass deportation.
Wrong They worked together DURING WW2 too and after.
There was a list in Hungary for one where zionists decided the ones that would later go to Israel could go and let the rest go to the camps.
In line with the fanatic, fascist and antisemitic thinking of zionists.
And with this quote from Ben Gurion: ““If I knew that it was possible to save all the children of Germany by transporting them to England, and only half by transferring them to the Land of Israel, I would choose the latter”Interesting… I cant find any reliable info backing that up. Especially the second part claiming thats the reason the nazi’s “turned on” the jews. I think you’ve been severely mislead by whoever told you that information. It sounds like something I’d hear from a Joe rogan guest.
While I’m sure Holocaust historiography has evolved over the last 50 years since it was published, the latter half of The Twisted Road to Auschwitz: Nazi Policy towards German Jews 1933-1939 covers how among other plans to set up Jewish colonies around the world, the Nazis did cultivate relationships with Zionist groups when trying to expel Jews from Germany.
The book makes a case that, to the Nazis, the Holocaust became a “final solution” when all the other “solutions” they tried for expeling the Jews from German public life before WW2 broke out had failed (eg, the aforementioned failed colonial projects).
I’d say that Evrala’s comment has plenty of credible historical support.
When I say that the Nazi’s turned on them, I’m saying that these select individuals that thought that working with the Nazi’s would save them. It did not.
There were a few exceptions, there were some people that higher ups in the Nazi party helped to escape. For instance Adolf Eichman was proud of the fact that while many Nazis would point out a few “good ones” among the jews he was more pure in his belief.
The support for deporting Jews into Palestine was called the Haavara Agreement. 60,000 Jews were migrated to Palestine from 1933 to 1939. It was an agreement between the Zionist Federation of Germany and the Nazi government. The thought was that by working with the government they could make things easier on Jews still living in Germany.
Germany also got a lot of good international press for doing it at the time.
