0x0@lemmy.zip to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 month agorace conditionslemmy.zipexternal-linkmessage-square87fedilinkarrow-up1883arrow-down125
arrow-up1858arrow-down1external-linkrace conditionslemmy.zip0x0@lemmy.zip to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 month agomessage-square87fedilink
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·29 days agoFun fact, some languages are not turing complete and I believe people would still consider them programming languages. They’re typically targeted at making mathematical proofs.
minus-squarenialv7@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·29 days agoI did say “general purpose”. And many proof assistants are Turing Complete actually, such as Lean.
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·29 days ago I did say “general purpose”. I did say “fun fact”.
Fun fact, some languages are not turing complete and I believe people would still consider them programming languages. They’re typically targeted at making mathematical proofs.
I did say “general purpose”. And many proof assistants are Turing Complete actually, such as Lean.
I did say “fun fact”.