lebkuchen@feddit.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 22 hours agoGOP sneaks decade-long AI regulation ban into spending bill - Ars Technicaarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square51fedilinkarrow-up1417arrow-down13
arrow-up1414arrow-down1external-linkGOP sneaks decade-long AI regulation ban into spending bill - Ars Technicaarstechnica.comlebkuchen@feddit.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 22 hours agomessage-square51fedilink
minus-squaremesa@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up31arrow-down2·20 hours agoCould we just…call everything AI then and it cant be regulated. Cause that would be hilarious.
minus-squareInitiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 hours agoIt’s funny but sad. Vague, selectively-enforcable laws are the point. We can’t just call something AI to prevent regulation. They can, though. With “laws” like this, the government can freely pick and choose who is punished and who is protected.
minus-squareLodespawn@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20·16 hours agoSomeone needs to spin up an AI that continuously generates pictures that annoy Donald Trump and posts them to all social media, it should actively learn what makes him and his supporters feel the saddest and optimise for those attributes.
Could we just…call everything AI then and it cant be regulated. Cause that would be hilarious.
It’s funny but sad. Vague, selectively-enforcable laws are the point.
We can’t just call something AI to prevent regulation.
They can, though. With “laws” like this, the government can freely pick and choose who is punished and who is protected.
Someone needs to spin up an AI that continuously generates pictures that annoy Donald Trump and posts them to all social media, it should actively learn what makes him and his supporters feel the saddest and optimise for those attributes.