alessandro@lemmy.ca to PC Gaming@lemmy.caEnglish · 5 个月前U.S. investigates whether DeepSeek smuggled Nvidia AI GPUs via Singaporewww.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up173arrow-down17
arrow-up166arrow-down1external-linkU.S. investigates whether DeepSeek smuggled Nvidia AI GPUs via Singaporewww.tomshardware.comalessandro@lemmy.ca to PC Gaming@lemmy.caEnglish · 5 个月前message-square23fedilink
minus-squareSpikesOtherDog@ani.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·5 个月前I get the prevailing idea, and I can understand the reasoning behind it. My question really was trying to ferret out whether it was US laws that were violated, Singaporean laws, the initial trade agreement, or something else.
minus-squareNomecks@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·5 个月前The seller and buyer both violated US export controls, which is against US law.
minus-squareBCsven@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·5 个月前Why does China care about US law though?
minus-squareCypher@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 个月前The intermediaries care. This is very obvious.
minus-squareNomecks@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 个月前They don’t, but that wasn’t your question.
I get the prevailing idea, and I can understand the reasoning behind it. My question really was trying to ferret out whether it was US laws that were violated, Singaporean laws, the initial trade agreement, or something else.
The seller and buyer both violated US export controls, which is against US law.
Why does China care about US law though?
The intermediaries care. This is very obvious.
They don’t, but that wasn’t your question.