lemmy.sieprawski.pl
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
alessandro@lemmy.ca to PC Gaming@lemmy.ca · 6 months ago

Intel might be too big to fail — Washington policymakers are already discussing potential solutions if the chipmaker cannot recover

www.tomshardware.com

external-link
message-square
37
fedilink
151
external-link

Intel might be too big to fail — Washington policymakers are already discussing potential solutions if the chipmaker cannot recover

www.tomshardware.com

alessandro@lemmy.ca to PC Gaming@lemmy.ca · 6 months ago
message-square
37
fedilink
Too big to fail.
  • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    And let all those backdoors just walk away?

    • Mettled@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      I assume that you’re at least halfway joking about backdoors in Intel.

      • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Intel silicon has historically had a lot of “bugs”…

        • Mettled@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Every and any hardware manufacturer can or has.

          • trolololol@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            What he means is the feature of having a lightweight OS with no documentation running under the OS you as a customer is running.

            https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/s/c6bhbowtrf

            • DaPorkchop_@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              That’s not going to go away by switching to AMD or some ARM implementation, they all have their own equivalent. Maybe if you’re running some fully libre open-source RISC-V chip, but those are currently nowhere near capable of competing on the big stage for anything other than embedded/hobbyist stuff.

PC Gaming@lemmy.ca

pcgaming@lemmy.ca

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !pcgaming@lemmy.ca

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let’s Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 787 users / day
  • 2.08K users / week
  • 5.21K users / month
  • 12.4K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 10.9K subscribers
  • 2.94K Posts
  • 24.9K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
  • EXiLE@lemmy.ca
  • Uncle@lemmy.ca
  • BE: 0.19.8
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org