chagall@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · rok temuCalifornia bill would require ‘watermarks’ to signal content created by AIwww.sfchronicle.comexternal-linkmessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up1114arrow-down14file-text
arrow-up1110arrow-down1external-linkCalifornia bill would require ‘watermarks’ to signal content created by AIwww.sfchronicle.comchagall@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · rok temumessage-square17fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareMax-P@lemmy.max-p.melinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down5·rok temuWhat baffles me is that those lawmakers think they can just legislate any problem with law. So okay, California requires it. None of the other states do. None of the rest of the Internet does. It doesn’t fix anything. They act like the Internet is like cable and it’s all american companies that “provides” services to end users.
minus-squaretyler@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·rok temuThey call it the California effect for a reason. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/42097/1/__Libfile_repository_Content_Neumayer, E_Neumayer_Does _California_effect_2012_Neumayer_Does _California_effect_2012.pdf
minus-square50gp@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·rok temuso youre saying nothing should be done? great idea
What baffles me is that those lawmakers think they can just legislate any problem with law.
So okay, California requires it. None of the other states do. None of the rest of the Internet does. It doesn’t fix anything.
They act like the Internet is like cable and it’s all american companies that “provides” services to end users.
They call it the California effect for a reason.
http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/42097/1/__Libfile_repository_Content_Neumayer, E_Neumayer_Does _California_effect_2012_Neumayer_Does _California_effect_2012.pdf
so youre saying nothing should be done? great idea